Talk:Talbert W. Swan II: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 09:10, 23 December 2018

Articles for creation Unassessed

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 21 May 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Comment: Better, but there are still concerns to the tune of DGG's last review that need addressing. See WP:PEACOCK DrStrauss talk 09:07, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Comment: The coverage Primefac thought to be a source specifically about the Church (masslive.com) is actually the online presence of the Springfield Republican Newspaper, the largest newspaper in the Pioneer Valley and Western MA and a major New England paper. It is NOT a source about the Church, but a credible source. Mjones 17:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Comment: He probably would be considered notable , but this is an advertisement or press release. It includes extravagant quotations of praise, much too elaborate wording , and unnecessary description of the denomination. DGG ( talk ) 22:08, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Comment: Main coverage is mostly revolving around his becoming Bishop Given that said coverage is in a source specifically about the Church, it'swhich in my mind is just routine coverage. Almost everything else is either PRIMARY (e.g. the church he works for) or a brief mention. Valley Advocate is a decent source, though, and more like it would be very beneficial. Primefac (talk) 00:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC) Updating comments based on discussion on my talk page. Primefac (talk) 14:57, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

This person has received significant coverage in media amd holds a sufficently high church office for notability. Much of the tone issue has been addressed. I believe the best course of action is to allow mainspace editors to trim it down. Legacypac (talk) 06:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't trim.

I did not know who Swan was and I consulted this page to find out. While some rewriting is possible, there was nothing I would want omitted. Burressd (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 This person has received significant coverage in media amd holds a sufficently high church office for notability. Much of the tone issue has been addressed. I believe the best course of action is to allow mainspace editors to trim it down. [[User:Legacypac|Legacypac]] ([[User talk:Legacypac|talk]]) 06:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
+== Don't trim. ==
+I did not know who Swan was and I consulted this page to find out. While some rewriting is possible, there was nothing I would want omitted.
+[[User:Burressd|Burressd]] ([[User talk:Burressd|talk]]) 09:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)