Talk:Chandigarh film city: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:'''Support''': Merger with [[Chandigarh]] is appropriate. - [[User:Jazze7|Jazze7]] ([[User talk:Jazze7|talk]]) 06:28, 19 January 2019 (UTC) |
:'''Support''': Merger with [[Chandigarh]] is appropriate. - [[User:Jazze7|Jazze7]] ([[User talk:Jazze7|talk]]) 06:28, 19 January 2019 (UTC) |
||
No way it can be merged - there's nothing known as Chandigarh film city! its unheard of!! |
|||
Its a poor gimmick by property developers. |
Revision as of 13:41, 30 January 2019
India Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Proposed merge with Chandigarh
It is not notable enough for a standalone article. A small portion dedicated to the film city and the controversy surrounding it will probably suffice. — fr ❄ 07:09, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
- it's not even built, is it? Article seems like pure promotion; deletion might be a better alternative.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 23:00, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support: Merger with Chandigarh is appropriate. - Jazze7 (talk) 06:28, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
No way it can be merged - there's nothing known as Chandigarh film city! its unheard of!! Its a poor gimmick by property developers.