Talk:.55 Boys: Difference between revisions
Assessed |
→History -- Belted Case: new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Firearms|class=C|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Firearms|class=C|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|importance=low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|British=yes|Weaponry=yes|WWI=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Military history|class=C|b1=n|b2=y|b3=y|b4=y|b5=y|British=yes|Weaponry=yes|WWI=yes}} |
||
== History -- Belted Case == |
|||
Since steel is stronger than brass, it seems unlikely that the weapon system overall could be strengthened by cutting away a ring of steel in the chamber and replacing it with a ring of brass on the cartridge case. The abandonment of belted cases in modern magnum sporting cartridges -- despite ever increasing pressure levels -- indicates that belts do not help to contain high pressures. Possibly the belt was added to ensure positive headspacing (positioning in the chamber) for the slope-shouldered cartridge case? Or, the fact that the .55 caliber cartridge cannot fully chamber in a .50 BMG weapon (such as the common M2 machine gun) does not mean it would not jam in the chamber and take the weapon out of action at a critical moment in combat. So perhaps the belt is intended to provide positive visual recognition. Or perhaps it is designed to stop the round in the M2's belt feed mechanism, before it ever reaches the chamber. These are just guesses, but so is the current information in the article. It may be best to remain silent about things we do not know for sure. |
Revision as of 14:49, 10 March 2019
Firearms C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Military history: Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I C‑class | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
History -- Belted Case
Since steel is stronger than brass, it seems unlikely that the weapon system overall could be strengthened by cutting away a ring of steel in the chamber and replacing it with a ring of brass on the cartridge case. The abandonment of belted cases in modern magnum sporting cartridges -- despite ever increasing pressure levels -- indicates that belts do not help to contain high pressures. Possibly the belt was added to ensure positive headspacing (positioning in the chamber) for the slope-shouldered cartridge case? Or, the fact that the .55 caliber cartridge cannot fully chamber in a .50 BMG weapon (such as the common M2 machine gun) does not mean it would not jam in the chamber and take the weapon out of action at a critical moment in combat. So perhaps the belt is intended to provide positive visual recognition. Or perhaps it is designed to stop the round in the M2's belt feed mechanism, before it ever reaches the chamber. These are just guesses, but so is the current information in the article. It may be best to remain silent about things we do not know for sure.
- C-Class Firearms articles
- Low-importance Firearms articles
- WikiProject Firearms articles
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class weaponry articles
- Weaponry task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles