Talk:PureScript: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Undid revision 888566010 by 77.185.75.42 (talk) remain AFD record for historical interest |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
'''Future Directions''' |
'''Future Directions''' |
||
* Which aspects of the language are stable, which are in the progress of being extended & improved? |
* Which aspects of the language are stable, which are in the progress of being extended & improved? |
||
* Are there any essential design-principles that drive the evolution of the language? E.g. in C++ |
* Are there any essential design-principles or philosophies that drive the evolution of the language? E.g. in C++, a central philosophy is "you should not have to pay for what you don't use"... are there any similar philosophies driving the evolution of PureScript? |
||
* are there plans for standardization? |
|||
<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/77.185.75.42|77.185.75.42]] ([[User talk:77.185.75.42#top|talk]]) 23:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
<!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/77.185.75.42|77.185.75.42]] ([[User talk:77.185.75.42#top|talk]]) 23:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 00:29, 20 March 2019
 | This article was nominated for deletion on March 31, 2015. The result of the discussion was delete. |
Proposed improvements:
Add the following sections:
Code examples
- At least a "Hello World"
- Maybe also a JavaScript FFI example, highlightling the ease of integration with existing JS-codebases/frameworks
Implementations
- Mention alternative implementations, in particular purescript-native which targets C++ as a backend instead of EcmaScript.
Applications
- Industry: There are already several companys which rely on PureScript for a significant portion of their codebase. A few of the major ones would be worth mentioning here, underlining the real-world significance and strength of PureScript.
Ecosystem
- documentation on pursuit
- Pulp
- Bower
- psc-package
- Editor integrations (vscode, atom, vim/emacs)
Community
- Maybe mention the discourse, github, slack channels, ...
Future Directions
- Which aspects of the language are stable, which are in the progress of being extended & improved?
- Are there any essential design-principles or philosophies that drive the evolution of the language? E.g. in C++, a central philosophy is "you should not have to pay for what you don't use"... are there any similar philosophies driving the evolution of PureScript?
- are there plans for standardization?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.185.75.42 (talk) 23:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)