User talk:Netoholic: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sangdeboeuf (talk | contribs) →Men's rights sidebars: new section |
. Tag: Replaced |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
|} |
|} |
||
---- |
---- |
||
==New message from Winged Blades of Godric== |
|||
{{talkback|David_Eppstein|biographical dictionaries|ts=11:15, 7 May 2019 (UTC)}} |
|||
[[User:Winged Blades of Godric|<span style="color: red">∯</span><span style="font-family:Verdana"><b style="color:#070">WBG</b></span>]][[User talk:Winged Blades of Godric|<sup><span style="color:#00F">converse</span></sup>]] 11:15, 7 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== The Great Replacement theory == |
|||
I came to this from an article about one of the Far-right parties active in Australian politics. I noticed immediately that you’d had some difficulty in getting emotive terms excluded from the beginning of the lede. You may (or may not) be interested in my attempts to do the same, which are currently raising hackles in the Talk page. Honestly, I have no right wing political point to make at all, but there are soooo many editors who seem unable to be unemotional in an article about something of the far right. I’m sure you know what it’s like... Anyway, your input would be valued. [[User:Boscaswell|<span style="color: green">Boscaswell</span>]] [[User talk:Boscaswell|<span style="color: maroon">talk</span>]] 07:02, 13 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Enough == |
|||
You're sailing close to the wind in several ways at the moment, including with [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chairman&diff=prev&oldid=896934513 this remark]: "Maybe the strategy is to [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Requests_for_closure&diff=896934394&oldid=896927121 try] to get this closed early, at a moment when you think the raw numbers are in your favor?" I posted at AN/RFC for closers "when appropriate". If anyone picks that up, ''they'' will decide whether to close after seven days or leave it open. Please read [[WP:ASPERSIONS]], and bear in mind that you've been alerted to the gender-related discretionary sanctions. [[User:SlimVirgin|SarahSV]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</sup></small> 20:06, 13 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
: [[User:SlimVirgin|SarahSV]]: Let's summarize your, let's say, unusual activity around this RM - things no one else seems to have done. You've been accused, [[Talk:Chairman#RM meta discussion|somewhat]] [[User talk:Springee#A request|convincingly]], of posting the link to the RM to WikiProjects which represent somewhat known viewpoints on this subject and would be expected to form a voting bloc. You've posted it to [[WP:NPOVN]] which, looking in the archives, has only [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=%22requested+move%22&prefix=Wikipedia%3ANeutral+point+of+view%2FNoticeboard&title=Special%3ASearch&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&advancedSearch-current=%7B%7D&ns0=1&ns4=1&ns10=1 rarely] had such notices posted to it... and when they are mentioned, there is usually some additional context and an invitation to discuss NPOV concerns of the article's ''content'' on the NPOV noticeboard itself. You've made additions of several images to the article, especially choosing only images which display the very rarely-used term "chairperson", in what could seem like an attempt to sway the views of casual participants that come across the RM. You've now asked for the RM closure two days prematurely - minutes after the nom posted his own "calculation" of voters. I theorized that it was because you might think that the present ratio of voters is the most advantageous. Now, I note, you've taken to editing the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requested_moves/Closing_instructions&diff=prev&oldid=896922200 RM closing instructions themselves] - something not insignificant to this RM. I may be wrong, but this is not an ASPERSION, its the beginnings of recognition of a possible pattern of manipulating the circumstances of this RM, and diff/link evidence to go along with it. I think you'd agree that perhaps taken together it could look bad for you, but I recognize I could be wrong about your intent. -- [[User:Netoholic|Netoholic]] [[User talk:Netoholic|@]] 20:33, 13 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
::Your "theorizing" is false. Do not engage in any more personal attacks or insinuations. That's all I'm going to say. [[User:SlimVirgin|SarahSV]] <small><sup>[[User_talk:SlimVirgin|(talk)]]</sup></small> 20:43, 13 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:File:John Kerry.jpg]] == |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]] |
|||
The file [[:File:John Kerry.jpg]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]] because of the following concern: |
|||
<blockquote>unused, low-res, no obvious use</blockquote> |
|||
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]]. |
|||
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[File talk:John Kerry.jpg|the file's talk page]]. |
|||
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Files for discussion|files for discussion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> |
|||
<span style="color:red;font-weight:bold;">This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the [[Help:Page history|page history]] of each individual file for details.</span> Thanks, [[User:FastilyBot|FastilyBot]] ([[User talk:FastilyBot|talk]]) 01:02, 14 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
==MfD nomination of [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Men]]== |
|||
[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|30px]] [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Men]], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for [[WP:MfD|deletion]]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at [[Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Men]] and please be sure to [[WP:SIG|sign your comments]] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of [[:Wikipedia:WikiProject Men]] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> <span style="white-space:nowrap;">[[User:Levivich|Leviv]] <span style="display:inline-block;position:relative;transform:rotate(45deg);bottom:-.57em;">[[User Talk:Levivich|ich]]</span></span> 15:38, 15 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
== Men's rights sidebars == |
|||
If my edits are {{diff2|896843376|"one-sided"}}, that's because I tend to edit in areas of personal interest to me, and [[WP:NOTCOMPULSORY|there is no requirement]] that I do otherwise. You are free to [[WP:Be bold|be bold and fix]] any problems you see with the {{tl|Feminism}} and {{tl|Feminism sidebar}} templates; otherwise, kindly [[WP:AGF|assume good faith]] and [[WP:FOC|focus on the content]], not the contributor. —[[User:Sangdeboeuf|Sangdeboeuf]] ([[User talk:Sangdeboeuf|talk]]) 02:19, 17 May 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 02:27, 17 May 2019
| Some thoughts: | |
|---|---|
"To avoid unkind criticism: say nothing, be nothing, do nothing."
|
"There are people who have good sense. There are idiots. A consensus of idiots does not override good sense. Wikipedia is not a democracy." |