Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mjs1991: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by DannyS712 (talk) to last version by Mjs1991
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mjs1991|Mjs1991]]===
===[[Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mjs1991|Mjs1991]]===
<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mjs1991|action=edit&section=4}} <b style="color: #002BB8;">Voice your opinion on this candidate</b>]</span> ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Mjs1991|talk page]])
<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Mjs1991|action=edit&section=4}} <b style="color: #002BB8;">Voice your opinion on this candidate</b>]</span> ([[Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Mjs1991|talk page]])
'''{{RfA tally|Mjs1991}}<!-- WHEN CLOSING THIS RFA, REPLACE THIS PART WITH {{subst:finaltally|[OPTIONALMESSAGE] OR [result=successful] OR [reason=SNOW] OR [reason=NOTNOW] OR (blank)}} SEE TEMPLATE FOR MORE DETAILS -->; Scheduled to end 14:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)'''
'''{{RfA tally|Mjs1991}}


====Nomination====
====Nomination====

Revision as of 04:49, 21 June 2019

Voice your opinion on this candidate (talk page) (0/0/0); Scheduled to end 14:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination

Mjs1991 (talk · contribs) – Hi, I've been an editor on Wikipedia since 2010. I've contributed in over 15,000 edits, and created just over 1000 articles ranging from films, biographies and albums. I've contributed in the effort to stop vandalism on Wikipedia, while having rights to rollback, auto-patrolled, pending changes and various other activities. I believe Wikipedia is much like a University or a school; learning different topics of rules and regulations of various pages within Wikipedia. At the moment, I've been helping in the backlog at WP:AFC. Thank you Mjs1991 (talk) 03:06, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
The work I intend to take part in and fix up is WP:AIV and WP:RPP. I've always had the goal to protect pages from suffering from vandalism, which I've had my time dealing with. I currently have rights as recent changes patroller which is what I'm always focusing on, along with AFC creations and much more. Being able to protect pages from vandalism and block user from constant vandalism would be a major aim for myself
2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
At the moment, I have over 1000 article creations as seen here on Xtools. Currently I have 1 GA-class article, and several B- and C-class articles. I contribute to Articles for Creation and New Page Reviewer, which relates to my vandalism efforts. At the moment, there is not much involvment at Request Page Protection and AIV which i feel I could contribute to. I also contribute to the Birthday committee, congratulating people on birthdays, first edits and administration, which i feel makes users, especially those with 5+ years of edits, a lot happier
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
Definitely. Editing conflicts is a regular thing that happens to everyone on a daily basis. I've very rarely been involved in serious conflicts, and avoiding pages on topics that I'm not familiar with. If there has ever been a time where major conflict has happened, I've always stopped and walked away from it, as I believe there's no point going back and forward in arguing. I've learnt to put conflicts in the past and move on from them

You may ask optional questions below. There is a limit of two questions per editor. Multi-part questions disguised as one question, with the intention of evading the limit, are disallowed. Follow-up questions relevant to questions you have already asked are allowed.

Discussion


Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.

Support


Oppose


Neutral


General comments