User talk:FF9600

Invite to discussion

Template talk:AMD Ryzen#Navbars for table templates?--Pizzahut2 (talk) 17:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, FF9600. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, FF9600. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Alfa Romeo GT

pls stop reverting that article, all Alfa model pages are made in same style, dont go and change one page and its not against any policy, even you try to say so, "Colors used in templates such as navboxes and infoboxes, and in tables, should not make reading difficult, including for colorblind or otherwise visually impaired readers." its better to read when it has some mild colors. so dont go change it. -->Typ932 ^T·C 14:37, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

Wikitable has a standard for a reason. When you force colors onto a table it interferes with accessibility functionally that users use related to issues with sight. Again the policy is not alter the color of articles from standard except in extreme one-offs. You have continued to exhibited WP:OWNBEHAVIOR with this article. If you continue to war edit over minor layout edits that get the article more inline with Wikipedia policy, I will report you to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.  #FF9600  talk 16:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)

If you start editing car model articles , you have huge field of editing, we have thousands of artcles with different tables. There is no reason to change table style, is not against any wp rule, so pls stop it. If you dont stop that reverting Il will report you as vandal. And your edit are not minor, with your editing that table grows huge and ugly and makes page more difficult to read and its not in line with all other car/brand articles -->Typ932 ^T·C 08:00, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

One more revert and u are in 3RR, pls stop it -->Typ932 ^T·C 14:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Same for you buddy ;)  #FF9600  talk 14:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

not you are far closer -->Typ932 ^T·C 14:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Could you pls stop making wrong accusations of edit warring? you are closer to edit warring than me. And there is no rule that you should use white color only in tables "Colors used in templates such as navboxes and infoboxes, and in tables, should not make reading difficult, including for colorblind or otherwise visually impaired readers." Neither there is rule about fonts in tables "Editors should avoid manually inserting large and small fonts into prose." You should read more carefully those style recommendations. If there would be strick rules in wikipedia we would have locked table and font sizes in class="wikitable". So pls stop edit warring and making those pages layout ugly and too big tables that breaks clean page style.- And you should also use some time to read and look how many different table styles we have in wikipedia articles (or in car articles), not all look the same , not even close and pls stop posting anyt8ing to my talk page, Im not intrested in arquing with you, I have already told this same to you earlier, but you dont seem to understand and you keep reverting pages. I dont have more to say to you, so pls stop posting to me. Im sick tired of these arguments every week, so stop it. -->Typ932 ^T·C 14:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

July 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in KTM 390 series, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

When you say "much easier to maintain", you're saying "my personal preference". Maybe you think it's easier to maintain, but others don't. That's what "personal preference" means. The ArbCom has ruled on this: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Sortan#Preferred styles.

Edit warring to replace an exsiting style like this without any consensus is precisely the behavior that the ArbCom and the MOS guidelines are telling you to not do. This is crystal clear. I hope you're not going around doing this to a lot of articles. It's considered to be disruptive editing. Dennis Bratland (talk) 22:17, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

I have "imposing one style on an article with inconsistent citation styles (e.g., some of the citations in footnotes and others as parenthetical references): an improvement because it makes the citations easier to understand and edit;" as per WP:CITEVAR. There were inline & "footnoted" refs. In addition I expanded the refs to include missing info.  #FF9600  talk 22:44, 28 July 2019 (UTC)