Talk:American Military University: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
From any other college listing that's on this site? Not sure why the images, logo would be any more like a brochure than let's say - Duke, Howard or AU. All of which have the same items removed from the American Military University entry. This is a real school, not some diploma mill. |
From any other college listing that's on this site? Not sure why the images, logo would be any more like a brochure than let's say - Duke, Howard or AU. All of which have the same items removed from the American Military University entry. This is a real school, not some diploma mill. |
||
*[[Howard_University]] |
|||
* [[Duke_University]] |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Well, {{user|DrL}} works for them. [[User:Haldane Fisher|Haldane Fisher]] 10:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC) |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
Revision as of 10:58, 30 November 2006
Seems to be closer to advertising copy than NPOV wikipedia information. I am not an expert on wikipedian things, though.
- I've done a revision. I agree, like many articles on for-profit schools, this needed a good clean-up. More could certainly be done, but for now it's still presentable, doesn't insult the school, but doesn't feel as much like brochure-ware. --Bobak 16:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
How is AMU's Different
From any other college listing that's on this site? Not sure why the images, logo would be any more like a brochure than let's say - Duke, Howard or AU. All of which have the same items removed from the American Military University entry. This is a real school, not some diploma mill.
Please explain
Well, DrL (talk · contribs) works for them. Haldane Fisher 10:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)