Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paybis: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Sonstephen0 (talk | contribs) Added a delete vote. |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
*'''Delete''' - This page has a few issues, but opining on notability alone, this should definitely be deleted. Nothing I can find in a search adds up to [[WP:ORGCRIT]]. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 21:40, 25 September 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - This page has a few issues, but opining on notability alone, this should definitely be deleted. Nothing I can find in a search adds up to [[WP:ORGCRIT]]. --[[User:CNMall41|CNMall41]] ([[User talk:CNMall41|talk]]) 21:40, 25 September 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - The company has no press coverage from reliable 3rd party sources. [[User:Sonstephen0|Sonstephen0]] ([[User talk:Sonstephen0|talk]]) 22:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - The company has no press coverage from reliable 3rd party sources. [[User:Sonstephen0|Sonstephen0]] ([[User talk:Sonstephen0|talk]]) 22:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''keep''': Page is thorough when it comes to its resources, but the second sentence of the first paragraph ("The exchange provides cryptocurrency to fiat trading and is considered to be one of the most notable cryptocurrency exchange in the Baltics.”) should be changed as it is of promotional nature. Nonetheless, I could find a resource that would support a similar claim “The exchange provides cryptocurrency to fiat trading.” - |
|||
https://finance.einnews.com/pr_news/389390442/paybis-slashes-bitcoin-purchase-fees-by-25-on-credit-and-debit-card-payments-bitcoin |
|||
Revision as of 08:04, 26 September 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Paybis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Despite the refbombing, it doesn't appear to meet GNG - the vast majority of the sources aren't reliable sources (largely blogs, with the occasional press release), and several don't even mention Paybis (they're more justifying things like "are people buying Bitcoin," which isn't relevant to the article) or are entirely unrelated to the article. I don't see any sources which look reliable. The claim to notability ("considered to be one of the most notable cryptocurrency exchanges in the Baltics") is entirely unsupported by the references. Article looks to me like undisclosed promotion/COI. creffett (talk) 23:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 23:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 23:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. creffett (talk) 23:17, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Agree that is fails the GNG, not enough indepth coverage in soruces that arent crypto-Parrots. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:33, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - This page has a few issues, but opining on notability alone, this should definitely be deleted. Nothing I can find in a search adds up to WP:ORGCRIT. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:40, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - The company has no press coverage from reliable 3rd party sources. Sonstephen0 (talk) 22:07, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- keep: Page is thorough when it comes to its resources, but the second sentence of the first paragraph ("The exchange provides cryptocurrency to fiat trading and is considered to be one of the most notable cryptocurrency exchange in the Baltics.”) should be changed as it is of promotional nature. Nonetheless, I could find a resource that would support a similar claim “The exchange provides cryptocurrency to fiat trading.” -