Jump to content

2002 California Proposition 51: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Link alive, fixed wrong formatting
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Proposition 51''' was a [[California]] [[ballot proposition]] on the November 5, 2002 ballot (as distinguished from the Proposition 51 on the June 1986 ballot, the "Multiple Defendants Tort Damage Liability Act," which resulted in the enactment of Civil Code Section 1431.2). It was officially titled '''Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Buses Act'''. It failed to pass with 2,774,539 (41.4%) votes in favor and 3,922,590 (58.6%) against. It was placed on the ballot through the [[initiative]] process.
'''Proposition 51''' was a [[California]] [[ballot proposition]] on the November 5, 2002 ballot (as distinguished from the Proposition 51 on the June 1986 ballot, the "Multiple Defendants Tort Damage Liability Act"<ref>{{cite web |url=http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_51_(1986) |title=California Proposition 51, Non-Economic Damages Assessed in Lawsuits (1986) |website=Ballotpedia |access-date=2019-10-10}}</ref>, which resulted in the enactment of Civil Code Section 1431.2 . It was officially titled '''Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Buses Act'''. It failed to pass with 2,774,539 (41.4%) votes in favor and 3,922,590 (58.6%) against. It was placed on the ballot through the [[initiative]] process.


The question before voters was:
The question before voters was:
Line 14: Line 14:


*Redirects specified General Fund revenues to state and local transportation-related purposes of about $420 million in 2002–03, $910 million in 2003–04, and increasing amounts annually thereafter, depending on the increase in the sale and leasing of motor vehicles.
*Redirects specified General Fund revenues to state and local transportation-related purposes of about $420 million in 2002–03, $910 million in 2003–04, and increasing amounts annually thereafter, depending on the increase in the sale and leasing of motor vehicles.

== References ==
{{Reflist}}


==External links==
==External links==
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20031011125746/http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_viguide.htm Voter Information Guide with text of Proposition 51]
* [https://web.archive.org/web/20031011125746/http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/elections_viguide.htm Voter Information Guide with text of Proposition 51]
* [http://ballotpedia.org/wiki/index.php/California_Proposition_51_(1986) California Proposition 51, Non-Economic Damages Assessed in Lawsuits (1986)]


[[Category:2002 California ballot propositions|51]]
[[Category:2002 California ballot propositions|51]]

Revision as of 21:56, 9 October 2019

Proposition 51 was a California ballot proposition on the November 5, 2002 ballot (as distinguished from the Proposition 51 on the June 1986 ballot, the "Multiple Defendants Tort Damage Liability Act"[1], which resulted in the enactment of Civil Code Section 1431.2 . It was officially titled Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Buses Act. It failed to pass with 2,774,539 (41.4%) votes in favor and 3,922,590 (58.6%) against. It was placed on the ballot through the initiative process.

The question before voters was:

Should the sales and use taxes raised from the sale or lease of motor vehicles be permanently allocated to specific transportation projects?

Official summary

  • Creates "Traffic Congestion Relief and Safe School Bus Trust Fund."
  • Redistributes portion of existing state revenues from motor vehicle sales/leases from General Fund to Trust Fund for transportation, environmental, and safety programs.
  • Allocates portion of these funds for: school bus safety; clean air programs; highway improvements; mass transit improvements including bus purchase, commuter and light rail expansion.
  • Provides funds for environmental enhancement programs and traffic mitigation programs.
  • Allocates money to 45 specific projects. For remainder of Trust Fund, specifies distribution percentages, restricts fund uses, requires accountability mechanisms.

Summary of Legislative Analyst's Estimate of Net State and Local Government Fiscal Impact:

  • Redirects specified General Fund revenues to state and local transportation-related purposes of about $420 million in 2002–03, $910 million in 2003–04, and increasing amounts annually thereafter, depending on the increase in the sale and leasing of motor vehicles.

References

  1. ^ "California Proposition 51, Non-Economic Damages Assessed in Lawsuits (1986)". Ballotpedia. Retrieved 2019-10-10.

External links