Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edward Rubin (attorney): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Feminist|feminist]] ([[User talk:Feminist|talk]]) 02:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Edward Rubin (attorney)]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Feminist|feminist]] ([[User talk:Feminist|talk]]) 02:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Edward Rubin (attorney)]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
*'''Weak keep''' a bit more work is needed it references--[[User:Dreerwin|Dreerwin]] ([[User talk:Dreerwin|talk]]) 03:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:42, 16 October 2019
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Edward Rubin (attorney) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
article has been tagged with "may not meet notability guideline" since 2012. So let's have the discussion - what makes him notable enough for a Wikipedia article? Quakewoody (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Quakewoody (talk) 15:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. lullabying (talk) 17:18, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep. WP:BEFORE gave me obits in LA Times (in-depth, major news outlet of global-level city), a San Francisco Chronicle reprint of LA Times obit (though with some info cut) and same state), and Sun Sentinel (shorter, but quite far from where the person was prominent in), but that's about it. ミラP 18:40, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - easily passes my standards for notable lawyers: lauded in a reliable source as a "having a reputation" in his field, trustee of major charities, "service on a major bar association committee or section", etc. I found this list that mentions his bar presidency. Bearian (talk) 19:26, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, feminist (talk) 02:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep a bit more work is needed it references--Dreerwin (talk) 03:42, 16 October 2019 (UTC)