Jump to content

User talk:Sakura Cartelet: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Autodesk Maya: new section
Line 58: Line 58:


I removed unsourced material that was added by [[User talk:45.20.151.16|45.20.151.16]]. And [[User talk:71.244.246.185|71.244.246.185]] keeps adding it back without explanation. It's not right to add material without a source is it? --[[Special:Contributions/94.1.34.5|94.1.34.5]] ([[User talk:94.1.34.5|talk]]) 19:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
I removed unsourced material that was added by [[User talk:45.20.151.16|45.20.151.16]]. And [[User talk:71.244.246.185|71.244.246.185]] keeps adding it back without explanation. It's not right to add material without a source is it? --[[Special:Contributions/94.1.34.5|94.1.34.5]] ([[User talk:94.1.34.5|talk]]) 19:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

:User 94.1.34.5 is not assuming good faith. This should be taken up at the in a admins incident notice board. [[Special:Contributions/71.244.246.185|71.244.246.185]] ([[User talk:71.244.246.185|talk]]) 19:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:29, 20 October 2019

Hello, this account was originally created to be used on public computers and other insecure locations. However, a while back I stopped using my previous main account of User:Vivio Testarossa (formerly User:VivioFateFan, and thus this account is my new main account. I suppose should I choose to reactive Vivio Testerossa, it will be used for insecure computers and locations like this account was originally created for. This account used to be know as User:Feinoha until 25 December 2016, where it was renamed to User:Sakura Cartelet. Sakuura Cartelet Talk 15:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note all talk page discussions are archived here.

Fair Use Statement: Before complaining read this

  • I scan hundreds of related articles at time, and do not have time to add rationales to images that lack them.
  • If it's fair use, and doesn't have a rationale, it gets tagged {{Di-no fair use rationale}}. No exceptions.
  • If I don't know whether it has a rationale or not it goes here.
  • As I am not an administrator, I do not actually delete images.
  • If I make a mistake and tag something as not having a rationale, even though it does, feel free to hit me with a trout.
wd-4WikiDefcon Level is Normal.
3.30 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot


9.5This user page has been vandalized 9.5 times.


Hello, I'm right now working of my many video games that I got at the lately and have no idea of when (not if) I'll get back to active editing. Sakura CarteletTalk 00:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naming of the recent Syria battle.

I don't need to wait for the discussion to end, this was already called by the previous name before the discussion began, there was consensus on the name. Someone apparently renamed it without consensus and now we should wait for consensus? There is already 5 votes against 1. A4516416 (talk) 05:19, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not all of the people who "voted" (keep in mind that article title discussions or almost any discussion on Wikipedia are not "votes") agreed that that should be the new name for the article. I think we should wait till a more clear consensus of what the best title for the article to be. After all there's no big rush that it has to be moved right now instead of (possibly) in a few days or so. Sakura CarteletTalk 05:29, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
So what you're telling me is even though 5 users have called for a popular name, we should stick to an unilateral name (rule breakingly) moved by an user without discussion. Please learn to compromise. A4516416 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 05:31, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edits

Hello, I notice my typo updates were not added to the Frozen (2013) website. I am curious as to why you are censoring valid information, aimed at expanding general societal knowledge and improving the average life experience? Please reply with all promptness as I am truly concerned for the direction Wikipedia has taken in the past several years.

Sincerely, Frederickthewatermelon Frederickthewatermelon (talk) 23:35, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When I looked at the edits that you made to the Frozen article, I noticed that both the word snowman was changed to thorax and a name of one person was replaced with another person. Neither of those changes were accompanied by any sort of explanation (via an edit summary or otherwise) so I reverted them with the warning message you saw on your talk page. Sakura CarteletTalk 23:40, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Autodesk Maya

I removed unsourced material that was added by 45.20.151.16. And 71.244.246.185 keeps adding it back without explanation. It's not right to add material without a source is it? --94.1.34.5 (talk) 19:27, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User 94.1.34.5 is not assuming good faith. This should be taken up at the in a admins incident notice board. 71.244.246.185 (talk) 19:29, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]