Talk:Dardic peoples: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:57, 21 November 2019

South Asia Redirect‑class

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject South Asia, which aims to improve the quality and status of all South Asia-related articles. For more information, please visit the Project page.South AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject South AsiaTemplate:WikiProject South AsiaSouth Asia articles
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Ethnic groups NA‑class

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

NA

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

What a joke. Dards are no people and neither are there any dardic languages, its just a fake identity. Zaffar.awan (talk) 16:46, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as Dardic people.

Dardic is a language group and that is a loose one. Rather it is geographical categorization for those unrealted languages in the Northern Pakistan. How on earth has a person from north west of Pakistan has something to do with Brokpa people in India. Futhermore nobody knows the word Dardic and nobody identifies with Dardic. Imazharyes (talk) 01:13, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

@Identityanddifference: Do not add original research. Read the policy properly, you cannot add made up content based on researches done on Kho people, Shina people and on different groups of Pakistan and write "Recent genetic studies identified the west Eurasian ancestral origin of Dardic people". Most sources doesn't even mention much about Dardic. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This sentence "However, no close genetic relationship of Shina was depicted with nearby residing Kho population group" which you took from the Shina article genetic source is only relevant to Shina. You cannot twist it by interchanging the word Shina with Dardic people like you did here. It is a blatant violation of original research. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: You mean if I just remove the line, "Recent genetic studies identified the west Eurasian ancestral origin of Dardic people" rest of this will be fine? Dardic is a linguistic term, not ethnicity and genetics prove this claim.

@Identityanddifference: 2 lines :- "Recent genetic studies identified the west Eurasian ancestral origin of Dardic people.[8][9] However, no close genetic relationship was depicted among different Dardic speaking groups.[10]". Remove the whole section and move this :- "Dardic is not an ethnicity rather a linguistic term" to lead, but I cannot see any source here, only a google search. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:12, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: Yes, the link looks dead. But this is working. https://books.google.com.pk/books/about/History_of_Northern_Areas_of_Pakistan.html?id=aPY8AAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

@Identityanddifference: Link the pages please. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I found it. page 43. Not fully visible though. Snippets are avoided in Wikipedia. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Identityanddifference: I have added the linguistic part as discussed with attribution to the author. Thanks for the link. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: :)

Revision as of 17:53, 21 November 2019 edit Fylindfotberserk (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 153,263 edits →‎November 2019 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:57, 21 November 2019 edit undo Identityanddifference (talk \| contribs) 59 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 25:		Line 25:

	::{{ping\|Identityanddifference}} I have added the linguistic part as discussed with attribution to the author. Thanks for the link. - [[User:Fylindfotberserk\|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk\|talk]]) 17:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)		::{{ping\|Identityanddifference}} I have added the linguistic part as discussed with attribution to the author. Thanks for the link. - [[User:Fylindfotberserk\|Fylindfotberserk]] ([[User talk:Fylindfotberserk\|talk]]) 17:53, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
			::{{ping\|Fylindfotberserk}} :)