Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloak of Levitation (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation|list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions]]. <sub><small>[[User:Zxcvbnm|ZXCVBNM]] ([[User Talk:Zxcvbnm|TALK]])</small></sub> 12:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation|list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions]]. <sub><small>[[User:Zxcvbnm|ZXCVBNM]] ([[User Talk:Zxcvbnm|TALK]])</small></sub> 12:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete''' or redirect per the previous AfD. No real sources were ever presented. The most coverage you'll see is A. Commentary directly related to Strange and B. Trivial coverage from MCU news articles. Neither are enough. The topic is basically part of Strange. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 13:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' or redirect per the previous AfD. No real sources were ever presented. The most coverage you'll see is A. Commentary directly related to Strange and B. Trivial coverage from MCU news articles. Neither are enough. The topic is basically part of Strange. [[User:TTN|TTN]] ([[User talk:TTN|talk]]) 13:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' as a notable item that passes [[WP:GNG]] due to existence of real published and nontrivial sources sufficient for justifying the article. --[[Special:Contributions/131.123.51.67|131.123.51.67]] ([[User talk:131.123.51.67|talk]]) 15:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:29, 22 November 2019
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Cloak of Levitation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fancruft about a single, non-notable item that fails WP:GNG. Even if it's worn by the notable character Doctor Strange, notability is not inherited. The name is also quite generic, I was WP:SURPRISEd to see this was a Marvel item and not just a fantasy trope. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 12:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete or redirect per the previous AfD. No real sources were ever presented. The most coverage you'll see is A. Commentary directly related to Strange and B. Trivial coverage from MCU news articles. Neither are enough. The topic is basically part of Strange. TTN (talk) 13:24, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as a notable item that passes WP:GNG due to existence of real published and nontrivial sources sufficient for justifying the article. --131.123.51.67 (talk) 15:29, 22 November 2019 (UTC)