Jump to content

Talk:Spira (Final Fantasy): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
JarlaxleArtemis (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 31: Line 31:


Also, why did you remove all of the locations below Djose? I will assume that this was some kind of mistake.[[User:PiccoloNamek|PiccoloNamek]] 01:47, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)
Also, why did you remove all of the locations below Djose? I will assume that this was some kind of mistake.[[User:PiccoloNamek|PiccoloNamek]] 01:47, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

:Yes, it was a mistake. I have no idea why it deleted the locations beneath Djose. I don't recall them missing from the edit preview. Weird, huh? -[[User:JarlaxleArtemis|JarlaxleArtemis]] 23:58, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:58, 11 January 2005

I worked a long time on this, so please feel free to fix any spelling or grammar errors I might have missed and to clarify anything you think clarification it.

Also, if anybody has any information on Spira in FFX2, please feel free to add it as well, as I have not yet played the game. I don't know much other than "It's happier".

PiccoloNamek 10:55, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)

Images

It looks VERY tacky when the separators touch the images. Also, the larger image sizes, combined with a needless thumb border, make the whole page very overwhelming. I'd like to keep it as clean cut as possible. I'd rather not start anything, so perhaps we can come to an agreement here. The larger image sizes don't bug me at all, but the separators intersecting the images really freaks me out.PiccoloNamek 14:24, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)

How is the reader supposed to know what's what without captions? Anyway, the pictures are just too nice and detailed to be at a tiny 150px, and the image size I used is standard. I moved the spoiler note to the top to avoid the intersection, though. Everyking 14:43, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Neat. Like I said, the larger images, don't particularly bother me. Sure, I liked mine more, but it's no biggie. Those lines were frying my brain though. By the way, is the image of Zanarkand doing This for you?PiccoloNamek 14:53, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)
No, it sure doesn't, none of the format skins do that on my computer. Maybe something to do with the browser. Everyking 15:13, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
I use mozilla, what do you use?PiccoloNamek 15:14, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)
Internet Explorer. Everyking 15:15, 17 Oct 2004 (UTC)
Then I'll have to keep editing and previewing it in both browsers until I can fix that without visibly changing the formatting.PiccoloNamek 15:16, Oct 17, 2004 (UTC)

Zanarkand/Bevelle articles

I have been wondering lately, this article, the Zanarkand Article, and the Bevelle article, all have basically the same information. (That is, the story of Yevon and the creation of Sin) and not a whole like to differentiate themselves from one another. The games just don't give you enough specific information on each city to warrant separate articles on them. I think we should redirect them here, and move any worthy content into this article. What say you?

I think that's a good idea. Probably everything that needs to be said about Spira and its various places can be said in this one article. Everyking 16:39, 26 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Second map of Spira

Don't re-add it. It ruins the formatting of the Zanarkand and Bevelle pictures. It's very pretty, and I've seriously considered adding it before by itself, but the fact that we already have one with English labels makes it kind of redundant. One or the other is fine, but not both. The reason I chose the plain one is because the pretty one is written in Yevon-script. The primary reason I reverted, however, is because the second picture pushed the picture of Bevelle out of the "The Beginning" section. This is unacceptable. The whole point is that Bevelle and Zanarkand are the beginning, they should remain together in the same section. Perhaps we could reach some kind of compromise, but I really don't think we need another map, especially one we can't read. ;)

Also, why did you remove all of the locations below Djose? I will assume that this was some kind of mistake.PiccoloNamek 01:47, Jan 11, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, it was a mistake. I have no idea why it deleted the locations beneath Djose. I don't recall them missing from the edit preview. Weird, huh? -JarlaxleArtemis 23:58, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)