Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 9: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→[[Instruction creep]] → [[Wikipedia:Avoid instruction creep]]: have changed redirect into an article |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Is that really a problem? If someone wants to know what instruction creep means, either we should redirect to some page that explains it (even a WP page), or we should create an article for it, and provide a disambig link to the page. The answer is not to delete it. [[User:Fresheneesz|Fresheneesz]] 22:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
* Is that really a problem? If someone wants to know what instruction creep means, either we should redirect to some page that explains it (even a WP page), or we should create an article for it, and provide a disambig link to the page. The answer is not to delete it. [[User:Fresheneesz|Fresheneesz]] 22:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' seems to be a sensible re-direct. [[User:Catchpole|Catchpole]] 15:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' seems to be a sensible re-direct. [[User:Catchpole|Catchpole]] 15:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''comment''' I agree with Fresheneesz; I have taken the liberty of starting an article on this with text taken from the associated Wikipedia page. Let me know what you think. [[User:Dar-Ape|Dar]]-[[User talk:Dar-Ape|Ape]] 21:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
====[[WP:RPPres]] and [[WP:PhilPres]]→ [[Portal:Presidency of the Philippines]]==== |
====[[WP:RPPres]] and [[WP:PhilPres]]→ [[Portal:Presidency of the Philippines]]==== |
Revision as of 21:38, 10 December 2006
December 9
I recently moved the article as per naming conventions for television series, this is now a non-descriptive redirect. PC78 22:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
This now redirects to a redirect. PC78 22:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Cross namespace redirect. — Seadog 19:48, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Is that really a problem? If someone wants to know what instruction creep means, either we should redirect to some page that explains it (even a WP page), or we should create an article for it, and provide a disambig link to the page. The answer is not to delete it. Fresheneesz 22:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep seems to be a sensible re-direct. Catchpole 15:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- comment I agree with Fresheneesz; I have taken the liberty of starting an article on this with text taken from the associated Wikipedia page. Let me know what you think. Dar-Ape 21:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Wrong crosspace redirect. --Howard the Duck 13:26, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
While "Double Dragon" is a series of computer games, "Double Dragon V" is a specific computer game, whose article should be seperate. Furthur more, the "Double Dragon" article does not give information about "Double Dragon V", instead, it simply links to the "Double Dragon V" article, and by such is forming a loop. Gelbard 07:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)