Jump to content

User talk:Sunnytwoyou: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
protected Mark Fuhrman page
/* [[:Response
Line 12: Line 12:


Please stop. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] pages, {{#if:{{{1|}}}|as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]],}} you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Test3 (Third level warning) --> [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 20:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] pages, {{#if:{{{1|}}}|as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]],}} you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia. <!-- Template:Test3 (Third level warning) --> [[User talk:(aeropagitica)|(aeropagitica)]] 20:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


Do you mean that my referring to Mark's book and page of his book for referencing is vandalizing? How? It's Mark's page on him and the book was written by him and I know him very well and I am not vandalising anything. I might not understand all of the programming of things in texting but I'm trying. I do know the current version is false and they are even asking for citations on his supposed quotes, those should not be in this text if they cannot be cited, yet mine keeps being dleted and I can verify all of it. I do not understand but we are going to talk to an attorney about how to make sure the verifiable facts are put in. Thank you


== Mark Fuhrman Page ==
== Mark Fuhrman Page ==

Revision as of 07:04, 11 December 2006

Mark moved to Sandpoint at the urging of his friend. He did not and has never lived next to any Grand Supreme whatever white supremicist group. He lived on a 120 acre spread in Sandpoint with his family to get away from the media and try to raise his two children in as normal environment as possible.

I'm sorry but I will have to revert the changes you made to the Mark Fuhrman article. On Wikipedia it does not matter if you know the subject personally; you cannot use them as a source. Wikipedia demands well-recognised sources for its articles so that it can uphold its policy of verifiability. "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth." Ian Cheese 00:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


I will file an formal complaint if you do not stop changing it to your personal opinions and it is not the truth. I will continue to change it over and over and over again. I will never stop telling the TRUTH based on facts! Leave it or we might consider a Defamation or Liability Lawsuit. You do not know Mark nor do you own this page. It is all verifiable information....I even gave the court case number in Superior Court and you deleted it! Who do you think you are. I will keep changing it back over and over and over and over again. I know him and you do not! All of my information is most definitely VERIFIABLE!

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page "Murder in Brentwood", Pg. 12. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. (aeropagitica) 20:43, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (aeropagitica) 20:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Do you mean that my referring to Mark's book and page of his book for referencing is vandalizing? How? It's Mark's page on him and the book was written by him and I know him very well and I am not vandalising anything. I might not understand all of the programming of things in texting but I'm trying. I do know the current version is false and they are even asking for citations on his supposed quotes, those should not be in this text if they cannot be cited, yet mine keeps being dleted and I can verify all of it. I do not understand but we are going to talk to an attorney about how to make sure the verifiable facts are put in. Thank you

Mark Fuhrman Page

responding to the comment you made on my talk page, the reason I reverted your changes to the mark fuhrman article is because the version there at least has some verifiable references. The books listed at the botton of the page and some verifiable internet links.

Your piece in the article had absolutely no references. Just because you're his friend does not count as a reference. Encyclopedia articles about living people are biographical, not autobiographical. People and their friends don't get to write about themselves, you see they might embelish or change things about their past. The information in the article needs to be referenced. The current version at least has some references. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bscottbrown (talkcontribs) 06:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

protected Mark Fuhrman page

Sunnytwoyou,

I have reverted the Mark Fuhrman article to the last good edit that had referenced. I then nominated the page for a NPOV (neutral point of view) and Factual Accuracy discussion. I then protected the page from edits from unregistered or newly registered users. It is now in the hands of others/administrators. Hopefully a good, factual article will come out of this.Bscottbrown 06:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]