Jump to content

Talk:Bombshell (2019 film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 9: Line 9:


Can someone please explain how the intro describes this film as having received "mixed reviews" when it has scores of 67% from Rotten Tomatoes and 65% from Metacritic? Metacritic clearly says the reviews were "generally favorable", so why does the intro conflict with and ignore these sources? Perhaps the early reviews were more negative but if this cannot be explained it needs to be corrected already. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.77.223.109|109.77.223.109]] ([[User talk:109.77.223.109|talk]]) 12:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
Can someone please explain how the intro describes this film as having received "mixed reviews" when it has scores of 67% from Rotten Tomatoes and 65% from Metacritic? Metacritic clearly says the reviews were "generally favorable", so why does the intro conflict with and ignore these sources? Perhaps the early reviews were more negative but if this cannot be explained it needs to be corrected already. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.77.223.109|109.77.223.109]] ([[User talk:109.77.223.109|talk]]) 12:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
: It seems to be the fault of a single [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bombshell_(2019_film)&diff=935609879&oldid=935602280 unexplained edit by one person] which I have now reverted. The sources (specifically Metacritic) says "favorable reviews" so the [[WP:BURDEN]] is on anyone who disagrees to explain why it should be anything else other than positive. -- [[Special:Contributions/109.77.223.109|109.77.223.109]] ([[User talk:109.77.223.109|talk]]) 23:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:05, 14 January 2020

WikiProject iconFilm: American Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconUnited States: Cinema Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force.

"Untitled Charles Randolph project" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Charles Randolph project. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed reviews?

Can someone please explain how the intro describes this film as having received "mixed reviews" when it has scores of 67% from Rotten Tomatoes and 65% from Metacritic? Metacritic clearly says the reviews were "generally favorable", so why does the intro conflict with and ignore these sources? Perhaps the early reviews were more negative but if this cannot be explained it needs to be corrected already. -- 109.77.223.109 (talk) 12:48, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be the fault of a single unexplained edit by one person which I have now reverted. The sources (specifically Metacritic) says "favorable reviews" so the WP:BURDEN is on anyone who disagrees to explain why it should be anything else other than positive. -- 109.77.223.109 (talk) 23:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]