Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Badabun: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
delete, reasons |
Weak Keep |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mexico|list of Mexico-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Mexico|list of Mexico-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Delete'''' - [[WP:MILL|one of thousands of controversial YouTube channels]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 02:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''' - [[WP:MILL|one of thousands of controversial YouTube channels]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 02:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
||
*'''Weak Keep''' - They are one of the largest and (by the important metric of raw subscribers) most successful media channels on the internet; I don't think it's fair to suggest they are not notable simply because the article largely focuses on their controversies - nor do I think the fact something is controversial negates their actual notability. That said, ''the article'' as it stands is largely about a single set of controversies. I think there's a proper article to be had on this topic, it just needs to focus on the actual channel rather than a single incident. See [[WP:NPOSSIBLE]]. -[[User:Rushyo|<span style="color: #FF00FF;">'''Rushyo'''</span>]] [[User_talk:Rushyo|<span style="color: #990099; font-size: 0.8em;"><sup>Talk</sup></span>]] 23:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:17, 14 January 2020
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Badabun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject does not appear to be notable outside of the controversy listed in the Controversy section of the article. letcreate123 (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:10, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
- Delete' - one of thousands of controversial YouTube channels. Bearian (talk) 02:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - They are one of the largest and (by the important metric of raw subscribers) most successful media channels on the internet; I don't think it's fair to suggest they are not notable simply because the article largely focuses on their controversies - nor do I think the fact something is controversial negates their actual notability. That said, the article as it stands is largely about a single set of controversies. I think there's a proper article to be had on this topic, it just needs to focus on the actual channel rather than a single incident. See WP:NPOSSIBLE. -Rushyo Talk 23:17, 14 January 2020 (UTC)