Talk:Auto-brewery syndrome: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:40, 17 January 2020

Medicine: Gastroenterology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Gastroenterology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Auto-brewery syndrome.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2020 and 28 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camille4397, Clheckma, Izpearce (article contribs).

Is citation 9 or 10 unreliable? Or both?

The sentence in the 'symptoms' section for which both citations 9 and 10 are provided has an 'unreliable medical source' tag. Which of these sources is being questioned as potentially unreliable. They both have potential problems Vice has a reputation for less-than-bulletproof journalistic standards, especially about scientific (and *especially* about medical (and **especially** about medical subjects to do with intoxicating substances)). Steven Gundry, while a doctor, has made claims referred to on his page as 'pseudoscientific'. Do both of these citations need to be reviewed by someone far more qualified by me, or removed and replaced with a more rigourous source? I'm not all that familiar with evidence requirements for medical pages. Thanks in advance Devgirl (talk) 20:13, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{WikiProject Medicine|class=Start|importance=Low||gastroenterology=yes |gastroenterology-imp=low }}
 {{Reliable sources for medical articles}}
-{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_North_Carolina_at_Greensboro/Symbiosis_(Spring_2020) | assignments = [[User:Camille4397|Camille4397]], [[User:Clheckma|Clheckma]] | start_date = 2020-01-14 | end_date = 2020-04-28 }}
+{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_North_Carolina_at_Greensboro/Symbiosis_(Spring_2020) | assignments = [[User:Camille4397|Camille4397]], [[User:Clheckma|Clheckma]], [[User:Izpearce|Izpearce]] | start_date = 2020-01-14 | end_date = 2020-04-28 }}
 == Is citation 9 or 10 unreliable? Or both? ==