Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hedgehog Security: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 22:22, 6 April 2020

Hedgehog Security

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company. Sources are all name-drops or written by the subject, with one being a mystery novel for some strange reason. Google News turns up nothing better (String: "Hedgehog Security"). —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Onward to 2020} 22:01, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Fails to meet WP:N - Tatupiplu'^talk

You tagged it for CSD even when the article just started. I think you really need to read the WP:NPP and WP:CSD. Altutmir (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rather interesting for a self-professed high school student to be familiar with either policy. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Onward to 2020} 22:19, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - the company has been widely cited in multiple independent reliable sources like Forbes, Computer Weekly, The Guardian and several other sources. Easily meets WP:ORGCRITE. Altutmir (talk) 22:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Those are name-drops and worthless as citations. —A little blue Bori v^_^v ^{Onward to 2020} 22:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please make a policy based argument? I don't get what you mean by name-drops. In the nomination you linked it with WP:QUESTIONABLE but none of these are questionable sources. The Forbes post is also written by their staff, not any guest contributor. Altutmir (talk) 22:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 *'''Keep''' - the company has been widely cited in multiple independent reliable sources like [https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2019/08/25/hacker-claims-he-can-immobilize-25000-cars-at-the-push-of-a-button/#3f8c0ad57718 Forbes], [https://www.computerweekly.com/opinion/Security-Think-Tank-Context-aware-security-saves-time Computer Weekly], [https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/aug/12/engage-dont-broadcast-the-need-for-authenticity-in-social-media The Guardian] and several other sources. Easily meets [[WP:ORGCRITE]]. [[User:Altutmir|Altutmir]] ([[User talk:Altutmir|talk]]) 22:06, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 *:Those are name-drops and worthless as citations.  —[[User:Jéské Couriano|<i style="color: #1E90FF;">A little blue Bori</i>]] [[User talk:Jéské Couriano|<span style="color: #228B22">v^_^v</span>]] <sup><small>[[Special:Contributions/Jéské Couriano|Onward to 2020]]</small></sup> 22:18, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
+:::Can you please make a policy based argument? I don't get what you mean by name-drops. In the nomination you linked it with [[WP:QUESTIONABLE]] but none of these are questionable sources. The Forbes post is also written by their staff, not any guest contributor. [[User:Altutmir|Altutmir]] ([[User talk:Altutmir|talk]]) 22:22, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/United Kingdom|list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:20, 6 April 2020 (UTC)</small>
 :<small class="delsort-notice">Note:  This discussion has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:21, 6 April 2020 (UTC)</small>