User talk:Chuqqling

What vandalism is not

Firstly, greetings. Secondly, edits such as this and this are elaborating on existing content, not examples of vandalism. Vandalism is making unconstructive alterations, such as this one. Indeed, one could argue this alteration of yours is vandalism given the careless removal of information. Please keep this in mind in the future. MSportWiki (talk) 08:45, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

You seem to be completely confused. You've linked to two edits of mine, which undid vandalism, and cited them as "elaborating on existing content". Presuming that you meant to link to the edits I undid. Replacing "The 53-lap race was won by Michael Schumacher driving for Ferrari" with "Ferrari's Michael Schumacher has won the Italian Grand Prix" is obviously vandalism, and not "elaborating on existing content". But apparently you perceived something valuable in that edit?

And do not dare to suggest that my edit could be argued to be vandalism. No such argument is possible. I regard your suggestion as a personal attack of a highly insulting nature. I was undoing edits by an ipv6 address which had vandalised numerous articles. If you think those edits were not vandalism, you are free to explain why; do not make personal insults while doing so. Chuqqling (talk) 10:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

I was about to say exactly the same thing. I recommend you take a read of WP:VANDAL to gain a clearer idea of what vandalism is. Thank you,
SSSB (talk) 08:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

So what value did you perceive in the edits which removed content from F1 articles and rewrote sentences using the obviously incorrect tense? Chuqqling (talk) 10:02, 16 May 2020 (UTC)