Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Personality Crisis (band): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:19, 22 December 2006

Personality Crisis (band)

No assertion of notability, previously speedied twice before, only 48 Ghits for article title, no reliable sources, no sources at all, no sources to support notability, POV, sounds like an advert, nothing that would lead me to believe that this lot pass WP:MUSIC. Moreschi ^Deletion! 16:08, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Assertion of notability=yes, sufficient assertion of notability=no. Heimstern Läufer 19:14, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. On the contrary, the band indeed passes WP:MUSIC! Criterion 6: "Contains at least one member who was once a part of or later joined a band that is otherwise notable." This is not your average "I'm in a garage band so let's make an article about it" kind of article. —EdGl 23:37, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Requires editing for a keep - doesn't mention who went on to form what subsequently notable bands, nor do those notable band's articles link to Personality Crisis (band). Without these edits, I vote delete. Josh Parris#: 00:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Read fourth sentence in. Does this satisfy your condition to keep? —EdGl 00:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep based on marginal notability. Needs editing. Doczilla 07:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (do I get a vote as I'm the page originator?) There's a lot of info (unfortunately not that I can produce verifiable) that argues for notability, I've done a bit more work to clarify where verifiable info exists. Ketchumk

Revision as of 23:41, 21 December 2006 edit EdGl (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 14,645 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 01:19, 22 December 2006 edit undo Ketchumk (talk \| contribs) 46 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*'''Weak keep''' based on marginal notability. Needs editing. [[User:Doczilla\|Doczilla]] 07:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)		*'''Weak keep''' based on marginal notability. Needs editing. [[User:Doczilla\|Doczilla]] 07:43, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

	*'''Keep''' (do I get a vote as I'm the page originator?) There's a lot of info (unfortunately not that I can produce verifiable) that argues for notability, I've done a bit more work to clarify where verifiable info exists. ~~{{unsigned~~\|Ketchumk}}		*'''Keep''' (do I get a vote as I'm the page originator?) There's a lot of info (unfortunately not that I can produce verifiable) that argues for notability, I've done a bit more work to clarify where verifiable info exists. [[User:Ketchumk\|Ketchumk]]