User talk:BetsyRMadison: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
→On politics and policy: new section |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
Sincerely, [[User:AzureCitizen|AzureCitizen]] ([[User talk:AzureCitizen|talk]]) 23:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC) |
Sincerely, [[User:AzureCitizen|AzureCitizen]] ([[User talk:AzureCitizen|talk]]) 23:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
</div> |
</div> |
||
== On politics and policy == |
|||
For what it's worth, personally I think the subject of that article is a horrible person who should be in jail at the very least, but it's really important for the integrity of the project that we uphold policy at all times and for all subjects. There are thousands of clear-cut examples that I suspect could triple that article's length if they were all included; I don't think we should be spending effort on the ambiguous ones, particularly when it risks giving the impression of editor bias (like this one's inclusion in the wrong section). No dissuasion intended of course, just some insight into my approach that doesn't really belong on the article talk page. <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-size:0.75em">– [[User:NULL|<span style="color:dimgray">NULL</span>]] <span style="display:inline-block;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1em">‹[[User talk:NULL#top|talk]]›<br/>‹[[Special:Contributions/NULL|edits]]›</span></span> 13:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:05, 3 June 2020
Welcome BetsyRMadison!
To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes
~~~~
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
Sincerely, AzureCitizen (talk) 23:43, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
On politics and policy
For what it's worth, personally I think the subject of that article is a horrible person who should be in jail at the very least, but it's really important for the integrity of the project that we uphold policy at all times and for all subjects. There are thousands of clear-cut examples that I suspect could triple that article's length if they were all included; I don't think we should be spending effort on the ambiguous ones, particularly when it risks giving the impression of editor bias (like this one's inclusion in the wrong section). No dissuasion intended of course, just some insight into my approach that doesn't really belong on the article talk page. – NULL ‹talk›
‹edits› 13:05, 3 June 2020 (UTC)