User talk:Curse of Fenric

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive and tendentious editing, not being here to contribute to the encyclopedia in a productive manner, personal attacks and uncooperative behaviour with a battlezone mentality. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Nick (talk) 23:16, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

SPI of Ylevental

I have been given a temporary unblock on my talk page access to address this to @Cabayi: per an email communication with WP. Thank you to @Sphilbrick:.

I have been watching User:Ylevental's contributions for some time to my frustration as he blatantly promoted his friend Jonathan Mitchell (writer) and pressed his point of view that Autism is a bad thing. This has reflected over a long period of time including attempts in bad faith to delete the articles on John Elder Robison, Jim Sinclair (activist), Autism Network International, Autistic Self Advocacy Network, Aspies for Freedom, Wrong Planet, Autistic Pride Day, Julia Bascom and most recently Shain Neumeier (twice with the second leading to the current SPI). Ylevental has created biased articles also supporting his point of view on Jill Escher, National Council on Severe Autism, Thomas A. McKean, David Miedzianik, Matthew Belmonte, Alison Singer and Jonathan Shestack as well as rejected drafts on another friend Thomas Clements and Marty Murphy.

The SPI notes that this is the fourth time he has been caught under SPI. As Shain is an activist in the same vein as those he has previously tried to delete, this represents Ylevental's continued crusade to undermine Autism positivity and press Autism negativity against WP:WEIGHT. He is trying to game the system as this paid editor effort clearly proves. As an aside he has also been biased in the political sphere trying to downplay bias in the media coverage of Bernie Sanders, even trying to get an article on it deleted.

I therefore put it to you that he be blocked from editing for a substantive period of time. I am in the process of a long winded full examination of his editing in readiness for a page on a blog I am working on, but it is a long job. I'd show it to you but even in it's present form it is huge and I wouldn't put you through that - along with the fact that I am only up to the beginning of February 2019 on it.

The period of blocking should be left to the responsible admins of course. I would prefer it to be indefinite, but I recognise that could be seen as harsh and biased on my part. Honestly - I think it should be no less than six months, not just for the SPI but also for his lack of a NPOV despite his user page disclaimer (which he has clearly lied on). Oh, and his excuse of mental health issues is a claim for leniency which I think he has tried before. He has a history of backpedalling in order to try and stay active on WP. Curse of Fenric (talk) 23:04, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

@Curse of Fenric: 95% of what you said is completely unrelated to the case, and is just WP:PERSONALATTACKS. I simply consulted with someone who I thought was an expert for guidance, who may apparently have been banned multiple times in the past Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Safaque. Not sure that this is on-topic for Wikpedia, but creating all those articles helped me be in touch with myself, as their perspective really helped me. Maybe some of these articles will be deleted, but I am fine with my work. The situation in America is really messed up now. I could be in quarantine for years, and the protests are getting out of hand. I am isolated a lot, but nothing like this. I did add to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion "Check to see if enough time has passed since previous nominations before renominating." I know that I have made some mistakes, given the political tension surrounding everything, but I really want to do better eventually. Ylevental (talk)

Additionally, I overreacted because another user flooded the Shain Neumeier page with numerous passing mention sources at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shain_Neumeier&type=revision&diff=957111320&oldid=956115039. Clearly, the article needed to be trimmed, and still needs to be trimmed, regardless of whether it should be deleted or not Talk:Shain_Neumeier. Ylevental (talk) 01:16, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

It is absolutely related to the case because the admin on the SPI made reference to three previous SPI's, all of which were related to POV editing. Telling the truth with links is not a personal attack. Stop making excuses with what is happening in America. You haven't adjusted to being Autistic. That's the real problem and it is up to you to correct that as I have said to you previously off wiki. If you want to do better, that is what you should be doing instead of pressing this POV that Autism has no positive attributes - completely against Shain's position which is the real reason you want that article deleted, just like all the previous ones. No you are not in touch with yourself - in fact you've gone off the rails hence the real reason for any issues you are currently having. To other readers, apologies for the seemingly tangential commentary but it did need to be said. There is a lot more going on here than anyone realises, but we should concentrate on the wiki editing and the combination of the SPI (the fourth) and the POV editing warrants an extended block. That is the point. For the record I would prefer the articles he created to stay, if anything for my blog page that I mentioned. Even the drafts although I'll understand the deletion upon six months being up on non editing. Curse of Fenric (talk) 01:09, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Additional Here have a number of admissions such as "I can be biased, but that is because there is a lot of tension in the autism field for the past few years and it gets to me." That is an admission of guilt and also proves my point that he is complaining about calling it a personal attack erroneously. If it gets to him, he should be totally disengaging , but he won't because of his long term determination to promote Autism as a bad thing and only a bad thing, when he has got it totally wrong. Curse of Fenric (talk) 01:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

ANI Discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Ylevental (talk) 01:11, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

I have nothing whatsoever to do with those IP's. Special permission was given for access to my talk page for my report and only my talk page is available. Curse of Fenric (talk) 01:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

All the admins know by now that you have been going after me for years with the exact same arguments. You can't hide it anymore. Ylevental (talk) 01:18, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

No they don't. I haven't edited on here for years and you can't prove otherwise. I know who it has been recently. He's on Fandom and admitted it and I told him to stop and he has done so. The most recent block you mentioned (I just looked) has nothing to do with even that. I have no clue who Nathan Phillips is and never even heard of him before seeing that stuff. Curse of Fenric (talk) 01:20, 17 June 2020 (UTC)