Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tami Lane: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Revert to revision 96339905 dated 2006-12-24 23:09:51 by Dmz5 using popups |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
**'''Added comment''' I left a message on [[User:Kintetsubuffalo]]'s talk page- I am amazed that someone would put a speedy tag on the article of someone who has verifiably won the biggest award in a major industry (and, aside from a Nobel Prize, Olympic Gold, or World Cup championship, perhaps the most well-known award in the world). -- [[User:Kicking222|Kicking222]] 19:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC) |
**'''Added comment''' I left a message on [[User:Kintetsubuffalo]]'s talk page- I am amazed that someone would put a speedy tag on the article of someone who has verifiably won the biggest award in a major industry (and, aside from a Nobel Prize, Olympic Gold, or World Cup championship, perhaps the most well-known award in the world). -- [[User:Kicking222|Kicking222]] 19:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' and let's assume good faith, I get a bit peeved when people fly off the handle on AfD debates that are not obviously bad faith nominations (and even then, fauxfanity is not necessary, IMO).--[[User:Dmz5|<font color="red"><b>Dmz5</b></font>]]<small>[[Special:Contributions/Dmz5|*Edits*]][[User talk:Dmz5|*Talk*]]</small> 23:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' and let's assume good faith, I get a bit peeved when people fly off the handle on AfD debates that are not obviously bad faith nominations (and even then, fauxfanity is not necessary, IMO).--[[User:Dmz5|<font color="red"><b>Dmz5</b></font>]]<small>[[Special:Contributions/Dmz5|*Edits*]][[User talk:Dmz5|*Talk*]]</small> 23:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' I don't feel strongly about this entry either way, but I just wanted to point out that the Academy Of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences gives out about 80 Oscars every year (and this year will be the 79th Academy Awards ceremony). The Oscar-winners club is fairly exclusive, but I can conceive of Oscar-winners who would not be considered notable per [[WP:NOTE]]. [[User:TruthGal|TruthGal]] 03:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 03:50, 25 December 2006
Procedural nomination. Bump from speedy. Neutral. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-24 08:44Z
- Weak Delete - Although she has won an Acadamy Award, I don't think that makes her notable enough (per WP:BIO) to have an article. Jayden54 15:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Winning an Oscar ought to qualify her under the WP:BIO provision for "other professionals whose work is widely recognized (for better or worse) and who are likely to become a part of the enduring historical record of that field." --Metropolitan90 17:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, as an Academy Award winner. Nationalparks 18:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Per everybody above that recognizes the notability of winning an Oscar. Drew30319 18:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strongest possible keep She's got a f***ing Oscar! Who would try to speedy this? -- Kicking222 19:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Added comment I left a message on User:Kintetsubuffalo's talk page- I am amazed that someone would put a speedy tag on the article of someone who has verifiably won the biggest award in a major industry (and, aside from a Nobel Prize, Olympic Gold, or World Cup championship, perhaps the most well-known award in the world). -- Kicking222 19:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and let's assume good faith, I get a bit peeved when people fly off the handle on AfD debates that are not obviously bad faith nominations (and even then, fauxfanity is not necessary, IMO).--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 23:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)