Jump to content

Talk:Shungite: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 34: Line 34:
:::The point isn't that shungite ''actually'' does anything to 'nullify' 5G, nor that any of the 5G conspiracy is true. It was added because it has become a noteworthy event surrounding shungite. While the claim itself is patently absurd, the reason it is present is because people are ''making'' the claim. [[User:LonelyProgrammer|LonelyProgrammer]] ([[User talk:LonelyProgrammer|talk]]) 04:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
:::The point isn't that shungite ''actually'' does anything to 'nullify' 5G, nor that any of the 5G conspiracy is true. It was added because it has become a noteworthy event surrounding shungite. While the claim itself is patently absurd, the reason it is present is because people are ''making'' the claim. [[User:LonelyProgrammer|LonelyProgrammer]] ([[User talk:LonelyProgrammer|talk]]) 04:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
:::Additionally, Shungite has been a part of the healing crystal wellness scam for years now. <ref>https://hibiscusmooncrystalacademy.com/how-to-make-shungite-water/</ref> They've made unfounded claims about curing cancer and I really think there should be some mention of that these claims are unfounded. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LordoftheRaccoons|LordoftheRaccoons]] ([[User talk:LordoftheRaccoons#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LordoftheRaccoons|contribs]]) 14:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::Additionally, Shungite has been a part of the healing crystal wellness scam for years now. <ref>https://hibiscusmooncrystalacademy.com/how-to-make-shungite-water/</ref> They've made unfounded claims about curing cancer and I really think there should be some mention of that these claims are unfounded. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:LordoftheRaccoons|LordoftheRaccoons]] ([[User talk:LordoftheRaccoons#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/LordoftheRaccoons|contribs]]) 14:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:::Just open an incognito tab and google shungite. First result is a card from Wikipedia, then 3 youtube videos about "healing crystals" then a bunch of Amazon links that claim to block EMF radiation in their description. This isn't a fringe thing. We need to have something about 5G or at the very least its connection to pseudoscience. [[User:LordoftheRaccoons|LordoftheRaccoons]] ([[User talk:LordoftheRaccoons|talk]]) 19:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:05, 8 July 2020

WikiProject iconGeology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconTalk:Shungite is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

DYK nomination

biological from 2 billion

68.188.203.251 (talk) 18:57, 20 August 2012 (UTC) What life was 98% carbon 2 billion years ago? The stromatolites were alge/limestone? Does a salp, a current carbon sink possibly exist then?[reply]

The pure shungite is thought to represent migrated oil that has been metamorphosed, hence the very high carbon content. Mikenorton (talk) 21:10, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shungite rock types: slipped classification categories

The "Terminology" paragraph currently says, "Shungite-bearing rocks have also been classified purely on their carbon content, with Shungite-1 having a carbon content in the range 98-100 weight percent and Shungite-2, -3, -4 and -5 having contents in the ranges 35-80 percent, 20-35 percent, 10-20 percent and less than 10 percent, respectively." (It is referenced with an article from an Elsevier publication with a paywall so I can't check the source.)

So, what d'you call the ore when it's 80-98% carbon? And, is stuff that's 0-10% carbon actually called a type of shungite rock? --Egmonster (talk) 03:40, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. The quote from the paper is "Borisov (1956) classifies shungite and shungite-bearing rocks by their carbon content. However, his terms, shungite-1 (98–100 wt.% C), shungite-2 (35–80 wt.% C), shungite-3 (20–35 wt. %C), shungite-4 (10–20 wt.% C) and shungite-5 (<10% wt.% C), do not distinguish between shungite and shungite-bearing rocks. Moreover, this widely accepted classification lumps together shungite-bearing rocks, which may have contrasting compositions and lithologies. Shungite-5, for example, may be represented by tuff, dolostone, limestone, chert, basalt or even gabbro." I don't have access to the Borisov publication, so I can only speculate that shungite-bearing rocks range up to a maximum of 80%, whereas the mineral itself is 98% or greater, so no need for a term for 81-97%, but that is a guess. Shungite-5 appears to be anything with a little bit of shungite in it. Mikenorton (talk) 10:16, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for checking that this quote matches the proximate source's text. I suppose this absurd distribution could be possible, but it seems more likely that a transcription error has interposed between Borisov and here. A classification derived from Borisov and others, Buseck et al 1997, is referenced by other papers, so one could replace the Elsvier nonsense above with that.--Egmonster (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coronavirus-5G Conspiracy Theory

Some big names like Dr DisRespect have been promoting this as a defence against the purported harms of 5G in relation to Coronavirus, wondering if this is more a widespread belief that might warrant a section. Faissaloo (talk) 12:22, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not now, it's far too early, and probably not in the future - we'll have to see. Mikenorton (talk) 12:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Shungite has been linked to 5G conspiracies in this The Atlantic article by Kaitlyn Tiffany: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2020/05/great-5g-conspiracy/611317/ 69.42.4.22 (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added a brief mention under 'Uses', but I can only reference The Atlantic. I'm unable to find other reputable sources to back anything up. LonelyProgrammer (talk) 02:06, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Removed - would need much better sourcing for such conspiracy cruft. Vsmith (talk) 03:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The point isn't that shungite actually does anything to 'nullify' 5G, nor that any of the 5G conspiracy is true. It was added because it has become a noteworthy event surrounding shungite. While the claim itself is patently absurd, the reason it is present is because people are making the claim. LonelyProgrammer (talk) 04:45, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, Shungite has been a part of the healing crystal wellness scam for years now. [1] They've made unfounded claims about curing cancer and I really think there should be some mention of that these claims are unfounded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LordoftheRaccoons (talkcontribs) 14:05, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Just open an incognito tab and google shungite. First result is a card from Wikipedia, then 3 youtube videos about "healing crystals" then a bunch of Amazon links that claim to block EMF radiation in their description. This isn't a fringe thing. We need to have something about 5G or at the very least its connection to pseudoscience. LordoftheRaccoons (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]