Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Asexuality/1: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:38, 18 July 2020

Asexuality

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result pending

My rationale is that this article doesn't meet criteria of good article criteria:

It has no Verifiable references. All provided references and references to research papers either directly or indirectly refer back to AVEN with attempt to circumvent criteria of Verifiable references;
It doesn't satisfy criteria of Broad in its coverage. It goes in unnecessary details like describing particular natural person personal website i.e. AVEN;
It doesn't satisfy criteria of being Neutral. Article is strongly affiliated with AVEN website;
It is not Stable. The evidence is that the Article has semi-protected status, which means there are ongoing editorial wars.

The whole my point is not to remove the Article itself, but to:

delist it first, because editors affiliated with AVEN use GA as an argument to state that AVEN is Verifiable resource trying to circumvent Wikipedia policies and rules. The article couldn't be improved by providing Verifiable references to the claims made, because Verifiable references simply do not exist and claims made in article are not correct.
When there would be no argument that AVEN is Verifiable source it would be possible to proceed to change the claims in Article to correct ones with references to Verifiable sources like Oxford University Press, which is the most authoritative and most reliable source for definitions, lexicography and words usage with most recent developments in English language taken into account, which is a concern of the Article. In fact AVEN itself has no even its own article, which makes it unreliable in the first place and in fact reflects definition of Questionable source.
The Article will be nominated for GA again when claims stated in Article will be changed and referenced to Verifiable sources.

Unfortunately, without these 3 steps process there is no way to fix Article to satisfy GA criteria as editors affiliated with AVEN are using GA status argument to circumvent Wikipedia rules and policies on Verifiable sources. AceRebel (talk) 23:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 The whole my point is not to remove the [[Asexuality|Article]] itself, but to:
 * delist it first, because editors affiliated with AVEN use [[Wikipedia:Good_articles|GA]] as an argument to state that AVEN is '''Verifiable''' resource trying to circumvent Wikipedia policies and rules. The article couldn't be improved by providing '''Verifiable''' references to the claims made, because '''Verifiable''' references simply do not exist and claims made in article are not correct.
-* When there would be no argument that AVEN is '''Verifiable''' source it would be possible to proceed to change the claims in [[Asexuality|Article]] to correct ones with references to '''Verifiable''' sources like [[Oxford University Press]], which is the most authoritative and most reliable source for definitions and lexicography with most recent developments in English language taken into account, which is a concern of the [[Asexuality|Article]]. In fact AVEN itself has no even its own article, which makes it unreliable in a first place and in fact reflects definition of '''Questionable source'''.
+* When there would be no argument that AVEN is '''Verifiable''' source it would be possible to proceed to change the claims in [[Asexuality|Article]] to correct ones with references to '''Verifiable''' sources like [[Oxford University Press]], which is the most authoritative and most reliable source for definitions, lexicography and words usage with most recent developments in English language taken into account, which is a concern of the [[Asexuality|Article]]. In fact AVEN itself has no even its own article, which makes it unreliable in the first place and in fact reflects definition of '''Questionable source'''.
-* When claims stated in [[Asexuality|Article]] will be changed and referenced to '''Verifiable''' sources the [[Asexuality|Article]] will be nominated for [[Wikipedia:Good_articles|GA]] again.
+* The [[Asexuality|Article]] will be nominated for [[Wikipedia:Good_articles|GA]] again when claims stated in [[Asexuality|Article]] will be changed and referenced to '''Verifiable''' sources.
-Unfortunately, without these 3 steps process there is no way to fix [[Asexuality|Article]] to satisfy [[Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria|GA criteria]] as editors affiliated with AVEN will use [[Wikipedia:Good_articles|GA]] status argument to circumvent Wikipedia rules and policies on '''Verifiable''' sources. [[User:AceRebel|AceRebel]] ([[User talk:AceRebel|talk]]) 23:25, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
+Unfortunately, without these 3 steps process there is no way to fix [[Asexuality|Article]] to satisfy [[Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria|GA criteria]] as editors affiliated with AVEN are using [[Wikipedia:Good_articles|GA]] status argument to circumvent Wikipedia rules and policies on '''Verifiable''' sources. [[User:AceRebel|AceRebel]] ([[User talk:AceRebel|talk]]) 23:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)