Talk:Eisenstein integer: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:01, 4 September 2020

Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Factual error in first image

The point titled in picture as 3+2omega is actually 2+2omega by actual grid position — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.101.120.235 (talk) 19:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look carefully: 3+2omega is correct (omega goes in North-west-ish direction).

Ordinary (rational) integer

"Thus the norm of an Eisenstein integer is always an ordinary (rational) integer."

Isn't every integer already rational? Obscurans 17:43, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Rational integer" is a term of art used to describe the whole numbers in contexts where "integer" may refer to more general algebraic integers. —David Eppstein 18:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quotient of ℂ by the Eisenstein integers

I wanted to link quotient but I'm far from sure which of the many senses is most appropriate. —Tamfang (talk) 01:06, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bad Image

I dont believe the image on the top right of the article is correct. The coordinate labeling seems wrong — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.172.58.58 (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What do you reckon it ought to be? —Tamfang (talk) 04:51, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

pictures of Eisenstein primes

I would suggest to include a copy of the picture of Eisenstein primes as can be found on the Quadratic Integers page. Needless to say, I would love to see a larger portion of the plane, as in the picture of the Gaussian primes! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.255.246.230 (talk) 12:33, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 The point titled in picture as 3+2omega is actually 2+2omega by actual grid position  <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.101.120.235|88.101.120.235]] ([[User talk:88.101.120.235#top|talk]]) 19:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+: Look carefully: 3+2omega is correct (omega goes in North-west-ish direction).
 == Ordinary (rational) integer==