Talk:Discourse (software): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:22, 16 September 2020

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

Advertising

Considering the software is not gold, this page sounds like a soapbox advertisement to promote the software (which isn't even a forum software tbh) --86.141.34.30 (talk) 20:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with this user. This is just advertising a software that isn't available and incomplete. --81.153.155.91 (talk) 16:26, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also agreed. It meets criteria for speedy deletion as it's quite clearly advertisement right now. Given it's been several months and no useful content has actually appeared, it does not meet the standards of wikipedia in any way at all really. --86.8.80.137 (talk) 18:02, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive links

Article doesn't need separate citations to FAQ, license and something else, as well as landing page! I will prune.

Also, am adding wikilink to biography of Josh Kopelman, as Discourse is in his BLP article. --FeralOink (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MTA

In sub section Server requirements:

Discourse requires an outgoing MTA ...

Abbreviation "MTA" has not been introduced. --Mortense (talk) 15:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shutting down?

Right now the wikipedia claims that discourse is dead. I find the structure of the article VERY strange. If this is the case, why is this not mentioned in a later section? Who wrote that part? Right now I am a bit suspicious; looks like vandalism, but I can't say. Either way, could someone have a look? 2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F (talk) 06:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 Abbreviation ''"MTA"'' has not been introduced. --[[User:Mortense|Mortense]] ([[User talk:Mortense|talk]]) 15:59, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
+== Shutting down? ==
+Right now the wikipedia claims that discourse is dead. I find the structure of the article VERY strange. If this is the case,
+why is this not mentioned in a later section? Who wrote that part? Right now I am a bit suspicious; looks like vandalism, but
+I can't say. Either way, could someone have a look? [[Special:Contributions/2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F|2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F]] ([[User talk:2A02:8388:1641:8380:3AD5:47FF:FE18:CC7F|talk]]) 06:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)