Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumption Junction (second nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
«+"*'''Merge/redirect''' to Shock site (which already has a paragraph each on a number of shock sites)."» |
Moscatanix (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:''' <font color="#CC6600">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</font>'''<br><small> Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, {{{1|[[User:Quarl|Quarl]] <sup>([[User Talk:Quarl|talk]])</sup> 08:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)}}}</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
:''' <font color="#CC6600">Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached</font>'''<br><small> Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, {{{1|[[User:Quarl|Quarl]] <sup>([[User Talk:Quarl|talk]])</sup> 08:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)}}}</small><!-- from Template:Relist --> |
||
*'''Merge/redirect''' to [[Shock site]] (which already has a paragraph each on a number of shock sites). <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—[[User:Quarl|Quarl]] <sup>([[User Talk:Quarl|talk]])</sup> <small>2007-01-02 08:09Z</small></i></span> |
*'''Merge/redirect''' to [[Shock site]] (which already has a paragraph each on a number of shock sites). <span class="user-sig user-Quarl"><i>—[[User:Quarl|Quarl]] <sup>([[User Talk:Quarl|talk]])</sup> <small>2007-01-02 08:09Z</small></i></span> |
||
* '''Keep''' this is a notable website. [[User:Moscatanix|Moscatanix]] 15:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:31, 2 January 2007
Kept by default (no consensus) in January (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumption junction), without much in the way of reasoning (we seem to have improved AfD since then! Hurrah!) but the article still, nearly a year later, has no reliable sources. With nothing on Factiva and only one trivial hit on GNews, that may be impossible to remedy. I'd merge and redirect to shock site, as Mailer Diablo recommended back then, but the debate is stale by now and WP:WEB has changed too. Back then a decent Alexa rank (~2k) was enough, now, it may not be, unless credible sources can be found. Guy (Help!) 12:55, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete or Merge Seems little more than advertising for a website DariusJersey 13:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as it fails WP:V as it relates to WP:WEB. If secondary sources can be found for this site demonstrating notabiliy, I'd be happy to change my vote. Until then though, the article in its current form is effectively an unsourced advertisement. Markeer 04:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- WP:MERGE with Shock site- and "Consumption Junction" redirect to Shock site Tonytypoon 14:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:V, WP:WEB. I'm not sure that it counts as a shock site by the general definition, since its purpose isn't just to get unsuspecting people to look at something icky. But merge there if ye must, it's better than keeping an unverifiable article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep or Merge. This semi-notable site has been around for several years. Deleting it entirely would be wrong, despite the content of the site MiracleMat 07:38, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Notable website. Forbsey 21:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - possibly a violation of WP:ATK. Yuser31415 01:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 08:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Merge/redirect to Shock site (which already has a paragraph each on a number of shock sites). —Quarl (talk) 2007-01-02 08:09Z
- Keep this is a notable website. Moscatanix 15:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)