Talk:Factor VIII (medication): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:46, 3 January 2007

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Can someone evaluate how important this is in relation to pharmacology? ★MESSED ROCKER★ 08:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is rather important to note that HIV and Hepatitus C can be transmitted by putting this stuff (Aafact) into people . I can see how it could be beneficial for some people to know this information , and it requires a greater desegnation of importance .

Because of this , and also because of the nearly infinite ramifications of putting pharmaceucicals into humans ; it is quite obviated that the careful use of dilligence to ensure that the importance rating is represented accurately before the rating is placed is a valuable prescription for responsible rating of pharmacological information .

AlphaMoron 12:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=Stub|importance=low}}
+{{WikiProject Pharmacology|class=Stub}}
 Can someone evaluate how important this is in relation to pharmacology? [[User:Messedrocker|<font color="red">★<small>MESSED</small></font>]][[User talk:Messedrocker|<font color="red"><small>ROCKER</small>★</font>]] 08:31, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
+I think it is rather important to note that HIV and Hepatitus C can be transmitted by putting this stuff ([[Aafact]]) into people . I can see how it could be beneficial for some people to know this information , and it requires a greater desegnation of importance .
+Because of this , and also because of the nearly infinite ramifications of putting pharmaceucicals into humans ; it is quite obviated that the careful use of dilligence to ensure that the importance rating is represented accurately before the rating is placed is a valuable prescription for responsible rating of pharmacological information .
+ [[User:AlphaMoron|AlphaMoron]] 12:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)