Talk:Tropical Depression Two-E (2006): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:11, 15 November 2020

Tropical Depression Two-E (2006) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Tropical Depression Two-E (2006) is part of the 2006 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
December 21, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
June 29, 2010	Featured topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Template:Hurricane

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Depression Two-E (2006)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article is great. It satisfies the GA criteria. However, I am placing its promotion on hold until one thing is cleared up. The article currently states "at 1500 UTC on June 3 the NHC classified the system as Tropical Depression Two-E". This statement is not directly cited but the time of classification is noted in two of the references: [1] says "1800 UTC" and [2] says "1500 GMT". Is this one of these sources in error? or am I missing something? If there are two values floating around perhaps the statement in the article should be cited directly to one of those. Also, the article states "partially flooded 42 houses" and is referenced to [3] which states "about 40 homes" - 42 seems oddly specific.

Also, this won't disqualify the article from GA status, but I thought I'd bring it up here. "developed good outflow" - perhaps something more descriptive than good would be better. Illustrative adjectives can also help avoid losing readers to other articles if they can catch the meaning without reading another article. --maclean 21:49, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, you really checked the thing out closely, nice! :) The sentence is cited by the next reference, which says 1500z (z meaning Zulu, which is UTC). The flooding thing was me getting a tad confused in translation, but you're right, it should be "about 40 homes". For the "good outflow", that was the wording in the source. Sometimes the source is more specific, saying something like well-defined outflow. It's not really the case here, and I can't think of a better wording than that. Thanks for the review, and I hope I cleared that up. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:37, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. I have no other concerns regarding the article. --maclean 18:57, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

There's nothing much about the tropical depression here (it did some damage, but it is minimal), and most other storms in 2006 PHS FT are now merged. SMB9 9thx my edits 09:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support TD's are not notable, with Noah's 19E 2018, being the notable exception (no pun intended). 🐔 Chicdat ^{Bawk to me!} 11:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
No damage and death. a weak depression MergeJanm 7 (talk) 20:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose enough information on damage. ~ Destroyeraa🌀 14:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@ChessEric, Cyclonetracker, and Dam222: What about you? SMB9 9thx my edits 01:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There is enough information about the impacts and there is a chance it can be expanded. Doesn't need to be merged.ChessEric (talk · contribs) 02:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support It did not affect much, so it would be appropriate to merge it Dam222 (talk) 06:45, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dam222: I think you mean support then.ChessEric (talk · contribs) 07:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 There's nothing much about the tropical depression here (it did some damage, but it is minimal), and most other storms in 2006 PHS FT are now merged. '''[[User:SMB99thx|<span style="color:#000000">SMB9</span>]][[User talk:SMB99thx|<span style="color:#444444">9thx</span>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/SMB99thx|<span style="color:#888888">''my edits''</span>]] 09:00, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' TD's are not notable, with Noah's [[Tropical Depression Nineteen-E (2018)|19E 2018]], being the notable exception (no pun intended). [[Special:Contributions/Chicdat|🐔]] [[User:Chicdat|Chicdat]] <sup>''<font face="Times New Roman">[[User talk:Chicdat|Bawk to me!]]</font>''</sup> 11:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
-*No damage and death. a weak depression Merge[[User:Janm 7|Janm 7]] ([[User talk:Janm 7|talk]]) 20:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
+*No damage and death. a weak depression '''Merge'''[[User:Janm 7|Janm 7]] ([[User talk:Janm 7|talk]]) 20:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 *'''Oppose''' enough information on damage. '''~''' <span style="color:#00CCFF;">Destroyeraa</span>[[User:Destroyeraa|🌀]] 14:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 :@{{u|ChessEric}}, {{u|Cyclonetracker}}, and {{u|Dam222}}: What about you? '''[[User:SMB99thx|<span style="color:#000000">SMB9</span>]][[User talk:SMB99thx|<span style="color:#444444">9thx</span>]]''' [[Special:Contributions/SMB99thx|<span style="color:#888888">''my edits''</span>]] 01:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)