User talk:E-960: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 21: Line 21:
Can you please comment at the bottom of [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:E-960 reported by User:François Robere (Result: )]] as to your future plans for editing the [[Poland]] article regarding abortion? The case might be closed with no action if you will agree to wait for the outcome of an RfC before changing the article again on the topic of abortion. Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Can you please comment at the bottom of [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:E-960 reported by User:François Robere (Result: )]] as to your future plans for editing the [[Poland]] article regarding abortion? The case might be closed with no action if you will agree to wait for the outcome of an RfC before changing the article again on the topic of abortion. Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 19:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
:[[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]], topics like abortion or even Christianity are not something I edit on Wikipedia being more focused on history, so I don't plan to get engaged in them any further. However, as I mentioned in the admin board discussion, user FR's behavior has been rather disruptive and a bit unusual — a pattern has emerged that some new account initiates a discussion and FR jumps in to take over the issue. But, in any case I will accept your recommendation to take a step back. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960#top|talk]]) 17:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
:[[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]], topics like abortion or even Christianity are not something I edit on Wikipedia being more focused on history, so I don't plan to get engaged in them any further. However, as I mentioned in the admin board discussion, user FR's behavior has been rather disruptive and a bit unusual — a pattern has emerged that some new account initiates a discussion and FR jumps in to take over the issue. But, in any case I will accept your recommendation to take a step back. --[[User:E-960|E-960]] ([[User talk:E-960#top|talk]]) 17:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
:: I don't recall anything in Policy saying we should XTools any editor who posts on a page we follow. [[User:François Robere|François Robere]] ([[User talk:François Robere|talk]]) 18:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)


== AN/I ==
== AN/I ==

Revision as of 18:35, 19 November 2020

Abortion in Poland falls under the WP:ARBAB sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 In particular, anybody who gets into a revert war to add or remove language relating to abortion from an article would be covered by these sanctions. You would be on safe ground if you wait for agreement on the talk page before changing such language. If it turns out that you can't edit neutrally, there is the possibility of a topic ban from abortion. EdJohnston (talk) 16:02, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look

There is a big BOOM coming soon, based on the substantial evidence I collected. This is what I had to devote my entire time to lately, unfortunately. I'm choosing to delay it a bit for a specific reason known to me only. I'm a sufferer of constant harassment by newly created accounts, and now it looks to me that the focus is on you. I could share some of the evidence privately with you if you had an e-mail option turned on. You seriously should reach out to the administrators familiar with my cases for guidance. - GizzyCatBella🍁 16:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GizzyCatBella, how can I share an e-mail privately, without some other user, getting it and start sending spam? --E-960 (talk) 16:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you are concerned about spam, then I can’t do anything about it; I can't share that information publicly yet. I have the e-mail option turned on, and there is no spam coming my way, so I think you are worrying too much. In any case, there is a problem with your reverts. You should not keep reverting, playing into the trap. AND ESPECIALLY, when information border lining your topic ban has been inserted, you should stop right there. I reminded you about it!! [1] Didn't I!? It would be best if you made other administrators involved in my cases aware of it this incident. - GizzyCatBella🍁 16:33, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can you give me an example of the harassment you experienced, I not sure how to categorize this situation. This incident was like many others on the Poland talk page, there is a lot of "red user names" engaged in some disruptive editing on the page. --E-960 (talk) 16:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
[2] - GizzyCatBella🍁 17:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
GizzyCatBella where could I report my situation, and to which admin, the most recent interactions with HQGG, Astral Leap and François Robere really does bear similarity to your situation with Icewhiz and company. --E-960 (talk) 18:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The complaint about you at WP:AN3 is waiting to be closed

Can you please comment at the bottom of Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:E-960 reported by User:François Robere (Result: ) as to your future plans for editing the Poland article regarding abortion? The case might be closed with no action if you will agree to wait for the outcome of an RfC before changing the article again on the topic of abortion. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:41, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EdJohnston, topics like abortion or even Christianity are not something I edit on Wikipedia being more focused on history, so I don't plan to get engaged in them any further. However, as I mentioned in the admin board discussion, user FR's behavior has been rather disruptive and a bit unusual — a pattern has emerged that some new account initiates a discussion and FR jumps in to take over the issue. But, in any case I will accept your recommendation to take a step back. --E-960 (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I don't recall anything in Policy saying we should XTools any editor who posts on a page we follow. François Robere (talk) 18:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Astral Leap (talk) 09:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]