Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaitlyn Dias (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 16:07, 3 December 2020

Kaitlyn Dias

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actress - Found this, this and this however that's the best I've found however those are the best I've found, IMHO TOOSOON for an article, Fails NACTOR and GNG, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 19:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:11, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:19, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of notability Kolma8 (talk) 21:55, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment- I have very less experience regarding notability discussions. Please excuse my lack of knowledge, but isn't playing a major role in a very famous film like Inside Out and winning a Young Artist Award enough for notability? Che (Talkin' Bout A Revolution) 10:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I don't believe it is, WP:NACTOR states:

1. Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.

2. Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.

3. Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.

1 - The wording says "has had significant roles" ie not "had a significant role" and given Inside Out is the only notable programe she's been in I would say she would fail #1

2 - No idea on this

3 - You could argue the award is a contribution to that field of entertainment but personally I wouldn't say it's enough - If she'd won a second award then sure but to me one award isn't enough.

So personally I would say she fails NACTOR for those reasons, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 11:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining. Appreciated. Che (Talkin' Bout A Revolution) 16:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 11:09, 3 December 2020 edit Davey2010 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 142,095 edits →Kaitlyn Dias: reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 16:07, 3 December 2020 edit undo Che12Guevara (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 1,083 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:

	:So personally I would say she fails NACTOR for those reasons, Thanks, –[[User:Davey2010\|<span style="color:blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color:orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010\|<span style="color:navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 11:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)		:So personally I would say she fails NACTOR for those reasons, Thanks, –[[User:Davey2010\|<span style="color:blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color:orange;">'''2010'''</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Davey2010\|<span style="color:navy;">'''Talk'''</span>]]</sup> 11:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

			:: Thanks for explaining. Appreciated. [[User:Che12Guevara\|Che]] ([[User talk:Che12Guevara\|Talkin' Bout A Revolution]]) 16:07, 3 December 2020 (UTC)