User talk:Pulisi

Notable articles I have created - for the full list visit /AC

• Niko B • Triller • Corpse Husband

This user is in Tier 4 in the UK

Credit to Theroadislong for this banner

Happy New Year!

Pulisi,
Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia, and a Happy New Year to you and yours! Ashleyyoursmile! 11:53, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

---

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

– Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year}} to user talk pages.

Ashleyyoursmile, thanks and a happy new year to you! Pulisi (talk) 11:56, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Shane Codd for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shane Codd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shane Codd until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GenQuest ^"scribble" 17:47, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Realjamesh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Realjamesh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Realjamesh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

GRINCHIDICAE🎄 16:16, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Also, I'd like you to explain this creation, which is sourced to fabricated statements that are obvious to anyone with a basic ability to read. I'm questioning why you changed this long defunct newspaper to being active just before you created this hoaxy article and how you came across this blatantly photoshopped newspaper. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 16:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Praxidicae, clearly judging by the sheer amount of vandalism this page received I made a mistake in creating an article on someone so controversial! For backround I first heard of James in August 2020 when I was writing the Triller page when a news article came up about him. I noticed him receiving a lot of press over new year and found some of his supposed actions hilarious and thought an article would be within Wikipedia's guidelines, I wasn't entirely sure especialy given the nature of his company and therefore potential paid press content, but the named article in The New York Age led me to actualy move the article. It was initialy reviewed as only having issues with some sources not being reliable, but was indexed anyway. Clearly his fans (or more likely haters) must have found out given the article's now 1st in Google for 'realjamesh'. I found the amount of vandalism overwhelming with multiple edits coming in before I could revert the previous one! I clearly realise my mistake and will be interested for the communitys desicion on this. For now, I'll remove any potentialy unreliable sources and unreferenced content but please ping me if theres anything else I need to help clean up as I realise this has become a mess very quickly. Thanks, Pulisi (talk) 16:32, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

I have some very serious concerns about your editing in this case, as you haven't sufficiently answered my question. How did you find the newspaper image? It does not show up in searches for him and I do not believe you came across it organically. Also the vandalism you speak of, that did not happen until after you published the initial article, which contains the exact same fabrications that I am referring to. The article is a result of your writing, not vandalism. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 16:34, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@Praxidicae, I found the photoshopped article on the second page of Google results for 'realjamesh news', which contains a link to The Internet Archive and the hoax picture. I did not realise it was fake I simply read the headline and put in the article, I should have looked more in detail I now realise, please understand my mistake I didn't know this mess would come of me making one article on someone, I wasn't even aware of previous deletions which have now been brought up at the AfD. I wish to move on from this and let the community decide the articles deletion as this has become too complicated, thanks, Pulisi (talk) 16:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)