User contributions for Bookmain

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

16:00, 5 June 2006 Woohookitty talk contribs blocked Bookmain talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (confirmed sockpuppet of HeadleyDown)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

05:4805:48, 23 November 2005 diff hist +1,393 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Space for balance

06:2706:27, 22 November 2005 diff hist +2,281 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Space for balance

08:4508:45, 16 November 2005 diff hist +1,193 Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests →Statement by party (name 5)

06:1606:16, 15 November 2005 diff hist +754 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →NLP not a science? What about behavioral psychology? What about "Human Development", Social Science, and Medicine?
06:0506:05, 15 November 2005 diff hist +953 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Meta Programs
05:5505:55, 15 November 2005 diff hist −457 Neuro-linguistic programming Engrams are core according to world view, NLP theorist view, critic view, and scientific explanation view.

10:1710:17, 14 November 2005 diff hist +145 Neuro-linguistic programming →Psychotherapy
10:1510:15, 14 November 2005 diff hist +114 Neuro-linguistic programming →Scientific review of NLP
10:1310:13, 14 November 2005 diff hist +93 Neuro-linguistic programming →Human Resources
10:1110:11, 14 November 2005 diff hist +126 Neuro-linguistic programming some more balance
10:0410:04, 14 November 2005 diff hist −152 Neuro-linguistic programming a bit more balancing and removal of wikispam
09:5809:58, 14 November 2005 diff hist −709 Neuro-linguistic programming Balance is good. Removed dyslexia assoc's wikispam

12:2912:29, 8 November 2005 diff hist +1,247 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Again, Proper Representation in the Opening
07:0007:00, 8 November 2005 diff hist −26 Neuro-linguistic programming Heaps damning verdict
06:5906:59, 8 November 2005 diff hist +333 Neuro-linguistic programming Heaps damning verdict
06:4906:49, 8 November 2005 diff hist +361 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Again, Proper Representation in the Opening

06:0006:00, 7 November 2005 diff hist +916 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →scientists
05:5105:51, 7 November 2005 diff hist −65 Neuro-linguistic programming The promotional NLP assoc neither represents nlp properly, nor the article properly. I removed the bit about dianetics.

05:4505:45, 4 November 2005 diff hist +753 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Reality Check
05:3605:36, 4 November 2005 diff hist +293 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Engrams
05:3005:30, 4 November 2005 diff hist −135 Neuro-linguistic programming Grinder's expertise is disputed. But the rest looks fine so far.

06:1806:18, 3 November 2005 diff hist +114 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →reframing
04:4204:42, 3 November 2005 diff hist +301 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Article Issues
04:3504:35, 3 November 2005 diff hist +311 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Article Issues
04:3204:32, 3 November 2005 diff hist +332 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Three Psychotherapists?
04:2804:28, 3 November 2005 diff hist +217 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →reframing
04:2604:26, 3 November 2005 diff hist +43 Neuro-linguistic programming reframe is possibly used with pos intent. Not always, so wording changed.

06:1206:12, 2 November 2005 diff hist +351 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Reality Check
06:0306:03, 2 November 2005 diff hist −289 Neuro-linguistic programming Kolb does not do VAK in the same context, and there is a lack of support for VAK (accelerated learning pseudoscience)

04:2904:29, 29 October 2005 diff hist +496 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Lilienfield (2003)
04:2504:25, 29 October 2005 diff hist −274 Neuro-linguistic programming Morgan's is a follow up study on Heap and the refs prove it
04:2304:23, 29 October 2005 diff hist +1,533 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Morgan and Heap

07:1907:19, 28 October 2005 diff hist +232 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Engrams
07:1607:16, 28 October 2005 diff hist +160 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →the new intro
07:1407:14, 28 October 2005 diff hist +523 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →2 POVs

05:0605:06, 24 October 2005 diff hist +313 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Compromising with fanatics should be discouraged
05:0205:02, 24 October 2005 diff hist +703 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Engrams
03:5703:57, 24 October 2005 diff hist +430 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Compromising with fanatics should be discouraged
03:5303:53, 24 October 2005 diff hist +568 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Engrams
03:4903:49, 24 October 2005 diff hist −268 Neuro-linguistic programming Mmm, this version is definitely more concise and accurate (variety of contexts is more neutral (less hype) than multidisciplinary)

08:0708:07, 17 October 2005 diff hist +131 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming Comaze's surreptitious deletions
08:0008:00, 17 October 2005 diff hist +783 Neuro-linguistic programming rv Comaze's deletion of specific facts about NLP's pseudo characteristics

04:0704:07, 13 October 2005 diff hist +403 Talk:Engram (neuropsychology) →Engrams & Neuro-linguistic Programming (removed)
04:0304:03, 13 October 2005 diff hist +819 Engram (neuropsychology) adding Richard Semon
03:5703:57, 13 October 2005 diff hist +1,617 Talk:Neuro-linguistic programming →Good research

24 November 2005

23 November 2005

22 November 2005

16 November 2005

15 November 2005

14 November 2005

8 November 2005

7 November 2005

4 November 2005

3 November 2005

2 November 2005

29 October 2005

28 October 2005

24 October 2005

17 October 2005

13 October 2005