User contributions for ClaudioSantos
Appearance
A user with 3,146 edits. Account created on 4 May 2010.
25 December 2010
- 06:0506:05, 25 December 2010 diff hist +506 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 05:5705:57, 25 December 2010 diff hist +404 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
24 December 2010
- 21:5121:51, 24 December 2010 diff hist +7 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 21:4821:48, 24 December 2010 diff hist +14 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 21:4321:43, 24 December 2010 diff hist +46 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 21:3321:33, 24 December 2010 diff hist +32 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 21:2621:26, 24 December 2010 diff hist +11 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 21:2521:25, 24 December 2010 diff hist +334 m Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 21:0321:03, 24 December 2010 diff hist 0 m Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 18:3418:34, 24 December 2010 diff hist +7 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 18:3018:30, 24 December 2010 diff hist +17 User talk:ClaudioSantos →Clean start
- 18:3018:30, 24 December 2010 diff hist +45 User talk:ClaudioSantos →Clean start
- 18:2418:24, 24 December 2010 diff hist +147 User talk:ClaudioSantos →Clean start
- 18:2318:23, 24 December 2010 diff hist +2,276 Talk:Aktion T4 →... Again ...
- 13:5313:53, 24 December 2010 diff hist −16 Aktion T4 see the last section of discussion. it was already pointed that Alexander make not distinction between "nazi" euthanasia and "other" euthanasia.
- 13:5113:51, 24 December 2010 diff hist +1,720 Talk:Aktion T4 →Alexander and Action T4
23 December 2010
- 17:3717:37, 23 December 2010 diff hist −16 Aktion T4 Tthat was the argument of the author. Alexander was precisely arguing against euthanasia in general that Aktion T4 was an example of what it means in real practice
- 17:2517:25, 23 December 2010 diff hist −34 Socialist Patients' Collective "terrorism" was a crime included in German Law years AFTER SPK was already disolved. None members of SPK could be judged as terrorist. I
22 December 2010
- 05:1005:10, 22 December 2010 diff hist −34 Socialist Patients' Collective none from SPK was ever condemned not even judged neither accused of "terrorism"
16 December 2010
- 21:2721:27, 16 December 2010 diff hist −35 Non-voluntary euthanasia the "best choice" is not an objective point of view but a point of view.
6 December 2010
- 18:5318:53, 6 December 2010 diff hist −35 Non-voluntary euthanasia if it is the best choice is a subjective point of view, POV
25 November 2010
- 21:3121:31, 25 November 2010 diff hist −112 Aktion T4 Aktion T4 was already well defined in a previous version which was removed by an anonymous user. So I'm restoring that previous version.
17 October 2010
- 21:4021:40, 17 October 2010 diff hist +135 Aktion T4 Rothbard argument is not covered by the precedent sentence as he refers explicity agianst the "rigth to death in dignity" but the other argument does not
- 21:3021:30, 17 October 2010 diff hist −2 m Aktion T4 Undid revision 391306636 by ClaudioSantos (talk)
- 21:2921:29, 17 October 2010 diff hist +2 m Aktion T4 No edit summary
- 03:5703:57, 17 October 2010 diff hist +3 m Aktion T4 No edit summary
- 03:5103:51, 17 October 2010 diff hist −11 Aktion T4 POV: if it is "typical" or not is not only subjective but also controversial.
16 October 2010
- 07:0707:07, 16 October 2010 diff hist +93 Aktion T4 no reason to delete a part of the argument of Murray Rothbard.
4 October 2010
- 17:1617:16, 4 October 2010 diff hist 0 Aktion T4 how many?
- 06:2606:26, 4 October 2010 diff hist +3 Aktion T4 No edit summary
- 04:5804:58, 4 October 2010 diff hist −8 Aktion T4 No edit summary
- 04:5504:55, 4 October 2010 diff hist +4 m Aktion T4 format
- 04:5304:53, 4 October 2010 diff hist +117 Aktion T4 →T4 and euthanasia
- 04:4704:47, 4 October 2010 diff hist −4 Aktion T4 more balanced
- 04:4604:46, 4 October 2010 diff hist +138 Aktion T4 no need to cut some part of trhe argument of the author
17 September 2010
- 04:4504:45, 17 September 2010 diff hist +16 Aktion T4 yes, it clearly states euthanasia continued after 1945
20 August 2010
- 03:3303:33, 20 August 2010 diff hist +7 Aktion T4 No edit summary
- 03:1803:18, 20 August 2010 diff hist +84 Aktion T4 No edit summary
- 03:1003:10, 20 August 2010 diff hist +316 Aktion T4 4twenty42o perhaps is so suspicious as lax.
29 July 2010
- 21:4721:47, 29 July 2010 diff hist +168 Aktion T4 see source and notice that Lifton missquote a letter from Heyde were allegedly he uses the term "Aktion T4" but that is not true as can be read in the Nuremberg-Trial's files
- 04:1704:17, 29 July 2010 diff hist −190 Aktion T4 until find a source is better not to add that claim about EU-Aktion as beeing also a name
- 04:0404:04, 29 July 2010 diff hist +1 m Aktion T4 although it is claimed in de.wikipedia
- 04:0304:03, 29 July 2010 diff hist +16 Aktion T4 although it is claimed in de.wikipedia
- 02:3902:39, 29 July 2010 diff hist +184 Aktion T4 therefore de.wikipedia was false claiming Aktion T4 was a name not used by the nazis
28 July 2010
- 23:2323:23, 28 July 2010 diff hist +176 Aktion T4 No edit summary
18 July 2010
- 01:5901:59, 18 July 2010 diff hist −90 Non-voluntary euthanasia "assesing objectively" is not an objective claim
29 June 2010
- 05:2605:26, 29 June 2010 diff hist +13 Aktion T4 No edit summary
22 June 2010
- 05:1405:14, 22 June 2010 diff hist +24 N User:ClaudioSantos ←Created page with '{{babel-3|es|en-3|de-1}}'
- 05:1105:11, 22 June 2010 diff hist +32 Non-voluntary euthanasia leaving voluntarity out would be worst than ambigous, it would be undetermined nothing, pure nothing. As the slippey-slope argument goes precisely on voluntarity, let define that pure nothing
- 04:3604:36, 22 June 2010 diff hist −1 Non-voluntary euthanasia there is not such thing as "less voluntary" except as ambiguity