User contributions for Rose Marie Aragon

This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:

16:13, 17 July 2011 Daniel Case talk contribs changed block settings for Rose Marie Aragon talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Revoking talk page access: inappropriate use of user talk page while blocked: profane and incivil outbursts)

View full log

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

17:1417:14, 15 June 2011 diff hist +25 m Usher (musician) Adding picture.

06:0506:05, 14 June 2011 diff hist −2 m Heracles No edit summary
06:0406:04, 14 June 2011 diff hist +25 Usher (musician) Adding a temporary image till a better one is found.

13:5913:59, 13 June 2011 diff hist −3,398 Heracles There is no mention of any male lovers on Heracles Roman Counter part. There are no citations to back up any of those statements. Putting such a thing implies he was bisexual, which he was not. There is no reading or listing of such a thing.

13:1913:19, 4 June 2011 diff hist +720 User talk:Rose Marie Aragon No edit summary
13:0913:09, 4 June 2011 diff hist +558 User talk:Rose Marie Aragon No edit summary
13:0113:01, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond 14 reverts. somebody please block him already. 14 reverts and he hasnt been blocked? what is going on??
12:5912:59, 4 June 2011 diff hist +229 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
12:5812:58, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond 13 reverts and counting
12:5512:55, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond Make that 12 reverts. Hello somebody block this kid
12:5212:52, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond That makes 11 reverts. You have got to be joking. Will someone block him already?
12:4812:48, 4 June 2011 diff hist +254 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
12:4512:45, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond 10 reverts to my 2 I plead my case.
12:4412:44, 4 June 2011 diff hist +231 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring No edit summary
12:4212:42, 4 June 2011 diff hist 0 User talk:Rose Marie Aragon No edit summary
12:4112:41, 4 June 2011 diff hist +442 User talk:Rose Marie Aragon No edit summary
12:3812:38, 4 June 2011 diff hist +274 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Rose Marie Aragon and User:Island Monkey reported by User:Island Monkey (Result: )
12:3712:37, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond Make that 9 reverts. You might be blocked forever at this pace.
12:3512:35, 4 June 2011 diff hist +186 Talk:Raymond v. Raymond →Song writing
12:3312:33, 4 June 2011 diff hist +325 Raymond v. Raymond 8 reverts!! A new world record!! And I am already all over it. I only reverted twice as I pointed out from the start. Its my 2 reverts to your 8.
12:3112:31, 4 June 2011 diff hist +122 User talk:Rose Marie Aragon No edit summary
12:3012:30, 4 June 2011 diff hist +477 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Rose Marie Aragon and User:Island Monkey reported by User:Island Monkey (Result: )
12:2712:27, 4 June 2011 diff hist +354 User talk:Island Monkey →Reverts
12:2212:22, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond That makes 7 reverts have fun being blocked. With your vandalism not to mention annoyance.
12:1212:12, 4 June 2011 diff hist +112 m User talk:Rose Marie Aragon No edit summary
12:1212:12, 4 June 2011 diff hist +222 User talk:Rose Marie Aragon No edit summary
12:1012:10, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond Now thats 6 reverts!! How long do you want to be blocked from wikiepia?? Let it go. My edits help the page. Stop reverting. If you keep going you will be blocked.
12:0812:08, 4 June 2011 diff hist +300 User talk:Island Monkey →Reverts: new section
12:0612:06, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond Now you are starting to annoy me. That makes 5 reverts!! My edits are good and improve the page. Like I said before singles success is often mentioned in the lead. Less notable then the singles on this album. I agreed with the two edits thats it.
11:5911:59, 4 June 2011 diff hist +326 Raymond v. Raymond It was my discussion in the first place. I agreed with the both of you and it ended it. Any further revertion of my good edits is vandalism and w/o warrant. I am not sure but did you revert me 3 times in less 24 hours??
10:3510:35, 4 June 2011 diff hist +49 m Usher (musician) No edit summary
09:5809:58, 4 June 2011 diff hist +4 m Raymond v. Raymond No edit summary
09:5509:55, 4 June 2011 diff hist 0 m Usher (musician) No edit summary
09:5409:54, 4 June 2011 diff hist +10 Usher (musician) A lot of minor edits.
09:4909:49, 4 June 2011 diff hist +43 Usher (musician) I added in the three Billboard Music Awards Usher recently won. And re ordered some stuff.
09:3509:35, 4 June 2011 diff hist +141 User talk:Rose Marie Aragon →June 2011
09:3109:31, 4 June 2011 diff hist +322 Raymond v. Raymond Consensus has been reached and the disscussion was on that edit, not my others. Those are a clear improvement. I would like to point out my last two edits were manual and not reverts. So Im not guilty of the 3 revert edit rule.
09:2809:28, 4 June 2011 diff hist +530 Talk:Raymond v. Raymond →Song writing
09:2109:21, 4 June 2011 diff hist +323 Raymond v. Raymond I kept the comment that is up for debate that I mentioned on the talk page. However I kept the rest of my edits in the lead. Singles success is often mentioned in many other articles with less notable singles. So what I added is a good edit.
09:1209:12, 4 June 2011 diff hist +767 Talk:Raymond v. Raymond →Song writing: new section
09:0709:07, 4 June 2011 diff hist +345 Raymond v. Raymond I'm fine with keeping it even though I do not view it personally as a reliable source like Billboard. And thats stupid thats like saying only one critic gave a positive review. It was never viewed that bad. Maybe a couple critics but most? No way.
09:0109:01, 4 June 2011 diff hist −311 Raymond v. Raymond Sorry buddy but really? Come on I don't think it will make the list for one of wikis most reliable sources like Rolling Stone or Billboard. An actual reliable source I might add. Tag: references removed
08:5808:58, 4 June 2011 diff hist −311 Raymond v. Raymond →Reception: Digital Spy is not a reliable source. Tag: references removed
08:5508:55, 4 June 2011 diff hist +2 Raymond v. Raymond No edit summary
08:5508:55, 4 June 2011 diff hist +320 Raymond v. Raymond No edit summary
08:4508:45, 4 June 2011 diff hist +23 Raymond v. Raymond Un doing something that is an opinion and not fact. The song writing has been viewed positively by more than one critic. A mixed response is acurrate.

04:2704:27, 3 June 2011 diff hist +338 Raymond v. Raymond →Accolades: Adding in the three Billboard music awards usher won.
04:2404:24, 3 June 2011 diff hist +85 Raymond v. Raymond A more accurate statement
04:2204:22, 3 June 2011 diff hist −55 Raymond v. Raymond It was not that strongly disliked or negativley viewed. The song writing and themes recieved a positive and negative response. It did not lean in the latter enough to put such a statement.

10:4310:43, 31 March 2011 diff hist +31 Raymond v. Raymond Making lead better and more tidy. It seems like everyone trys to make the lead one sentence.

15 June 2011

14 June 2011

13 June 2011

4 June 2011

3 June 2011

31 March 2011