User contributions for TheCampaignForRealPhysics
A user with 113 edits. Account created on 14 July 2011.
5 December 2018
- 20:5720:57, 5 December 2018 diff hist +1,310 Talk:Christopher Langan →Delete
13 September 2018
- 19:5219:52, 13 September 2018 diff hist −481 m User talk:Xxanthippe →Oh God! Another joyless Wikipedian with no sense of humour
- 19:5119:51, 13 September 2018 diff hist −772 Talk:Interaction picture Same look and feel across the three related pages
- 19:4819:48, 13 September 2018 diff hist −102 m Interaction picture "Look and feel" changes consistent with other articles
- 19:4519:45, 13 September 2018 diff hist +23 m Interaction picture →Summary comparison of evolution in all pictures
- 19:4219:42, 13 September 2018 diff hist +2,482 Interaction picture Table linking to other approaches. Consistent presentation across pages.
- 19:3819:38, 13 September 2018 diff hist +102 m Interaction picture How? See talk page. No different than other relevant pages Undid revision 859393251 by C.Fred (talk) Tag: Undo
- 19:3219:32, 13 September 2018 diff hist +934 Talk:Interaction picture →Oh God! Another joyless Wikipedian with no sense of humour: new section
- 19:2119:21, 13 September 2018 diff hist +56 m User talk:Xxanthippe ~~~~
- 19:2119:21, 13 September 2018 diff hist +102 m Interaction picture See your talk page Undid revision 859272366 by Xxanthippe (talk) Tag: Undo
- 19:1819:18, 13 September 2018 diff hist +425 User talk:Xxanthippe →Oh God! Another joyless Wikipedian with no sense of humour: new section
12 September 2018
- 22:5622:56, 12 September 2018 diff hist +102 m Interaction picture A title picture in keeping with the other relevant articles
29 May 2018
- 20:1120:11, 29 May 2018 diff hist +790 Talk:Valerie Jarrett →Why give the non-entity Roseanne Barr an entry on Jarrett's page?: new section
10 June 2017
- 20:3420:34, 10 June 2017 diff hist +960 User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Re Cornwall
- 09:1909:19, 10 June 2017 diff hist +720 User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Highly recommend Cramer's article
9 June 2017
- 16:2516:25, 9 June 2017 diff hist +1 m User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Re Cornwall
- 16:1916:19, 9 June 2017 diff hist +269 User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Re Cornwall
8 June 2017
- 18:2518:25, 8 June 2017 diff hist +71 Talk:Faster-than-light Moved section at bottom in new sub-section~~~~
- 18:2018:20, 8 June 2017 diff hist +1,126 Talk:Faster-than-light →Remi Cornwall's disproof section needs to be reinstated: ~~~~
- 18:1618:16, 8 June 2017 diff hist +1,378 User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Anyone can edit Wikipedia
- 08:5508:55, 8 June 2017 diff hist +435 User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Anyone can edit Wikipedia
- 08:5208:52, 8 June 2017 diff hist +448 User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Anyone can edit Wikipedia
- 08:5008:50, 8 June 2017 diff hist +256 User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Highly recommend Cramer's article
7 June 2017
- 17:1017:10, 7 June 2017 diff hist +361 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is ArXiv.org (only) considered peer reviewed?
- 17:0617:06, 7 June 2017 diff hist +4 m Talk:Faster-than-light →Is ArXiv.org (only) considered peer reviewed? Part 2
- 16:5916:59, 7 June 2017 diff hist +1,232 Talk:Faster-than-light Finish my point about Wikipedia prejudice and discrimination~~~~
- 15:5815:58, 7 June 2017 diff hist +129 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is ArXiv.org (only) considered peer reviewed?
- 15:5515:55, 7 June 2017 diff hist +812 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is ArXiv.org (only) considered peer reviewed?
- 15:1615:16, 7 June 2017 diff hist +782 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is ArXiv.org (only) considered peer reviewed?
- 15:0815:08, 7 June 2017 diff hist +335 User talk:TheCampaignForRealPhysics →Highly recommend Cramer's article: ~~~~
- 14:5114:51, 7 June 2017 diff hist −15 m Talk:Faster-than-light →Is ArXiv.org (only) considered peer reviewed?: ~~~~
- 14:4914:49, 7 June 2017 diff hist +694 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is ArXiv.org (only) considered peer reviewed?: ~~~~
- 14:0414:04, 7 June 2017 diff hist +386 Talk:Faster-than-light Is ArXiv.org (only) considered peer reviewed?~~~~
23 May 2017
- 15:5315:53, 23 May 2017 diff hist +285 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 15:4715:47, 23 May 2017 diff hist +602 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 11:4311:43, 23 May 2017 diff hist +600 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 11:3111:31, 23 May 2017 diff hist +699 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 10:2010:20, 23 May 2017 diff hist +595 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 10:1210:12, 23 May 2017 diff hist +302 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 07:1607:16, 23 May 2017 diff hist +306 Talk:Superluminal communication →Cornwall's disproofs: ~~~~
- 07:1107:11, 23 May 2017 diff hist +22 m Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 07:0707:07, 23 May 2017 diff hist +37 m Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 07:0607:06, 23 May 2017 diff hist +110 m Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: ~~~~
- 07:0307:03, 23 May 2017 diff hist 0 Talk:Faster-than-light Crucial point about whether FTL is sci-fi compared to other areas in physics or even "Fizziks" as Feynman would have put it~~~~
- 07:0007:00, 23 May 2017 diff hist +601 Talk:Faster-than-light →Is this really science fiction?: new section
- 06:5206:52, 23 May 2017 diff hist +1,524 Talk:Faster-than-light →Remi Cornwall's disproof section needs to be reinstated: ~~~~
- 06:2506:25, 23 May 2017 diff hist −48 m Talk:Faster-than-light Not science fiction. Any speculative theoretical physics would be science fiction then if can't be tested (say string theory)~~~~
- 06:2206:22, 23 May 2017 diff hist +5 m Talk:Faster-than-light →Cornwall's disproof section needs to be reinstated: ~~~~