User contributions for Aidayoung
Appearance
A user with 579 edits. Account created on 15 August 2007.
1 November 2019
- 09:1909:19, 1 November 2019 diff hist +2 CESNUR →Founders and associates: typo
- 09:1309:13, 1 November 2019 diff hist +1,671 User talk:Feoffer New section
- 09:0109:01, 1 November 2019 diff hist +650 Talk:CESNUR New section on Lewis
- 08:4308:43, 1 November 2019 diff hist +59 CESNUR →Founders and associates: the previous correction confused two different entities, CESNUR and The Journal of CESNUR. Faivre and Palmer are in the board of The Journal but not in the board of CESNUR.
- 08:4108:41, 1 November 2019 diff hist +21 CESNUR →Founders and associates: “was recognized” alone does not mean anything
- 08:4108:41, 1 November 2019 diff hist +4 CESNUR When Singelenberg said this is relevant
- 08:3808:38, 1 November 2019 diff hist −161 CESNUR I do not want to start a war but that CESNUR “defended” a criminal group such as the Order of the Solar Temple is serious slander: “reportedly” does not solve the matter and a single quote by the Communist newspaper L’Humanité is not enough to support such as sei riots accusation. It didn’t defend New Acropolis either and the fact that it cancelled the participation of the New Acropolis speaker I. 1997 is relevant and come from a hostile article. You cannot say Lewis was affiliayedn
30 October 2019
- 14:4014:40, 30 October 2019 diff hist +1,235 User talk:Aidayoung →Possible conflict of interest regarding Massimo Introvigne, CESNUR and Oleg Maltsev (psychologist)
- 12:2912:29, 30 October 2019 diff hist +925 User talk:Aidayoung →Possible conflict of interest regarding Massimo Introvigne, CESNUR and Oleg Maltsev (psychologist)
- 09:3109:31, 30 October 2019 diff hist +393 CESNUR →Founders and associates: Introvigne left his position in Alleanza Cattolica in 2016
- 09:2909:29, 30 October 2019 diff hist +25 Massimo Introvigne →Popular Culture and Vampires: the quote does not refer to CESPOC but to the Transylvanian Society of Dracula
- 09:2809:28, 30 October 2019 diff hist −3 Massimo Introvigne Moved Cipriani's appreciation to the lead, as it balances Kent's negative assessment. It comes from a standard manual on sociology of religion and Cipriani is surely well-known as a sociologist (btw, Faxneld is also published by Oxford University Press: [https://global.oup.com/academic/product/satanic-feminism-9780190664473?cc=it&lang=en&]):
- 09:2409:24, 30 October 2019 diff hist 0 m Massimo Introvigne →Life and work
- 09:2309:23, 30 October 2019 diff hist +263 Massimo Introvigne →Life and work: I found some criticism by Grayfell fair enough, but since other less authoritative publications are quoted for criticism, I have restored a reference to "El Pais," which is one of the most well-known Spanish daily newspapers, and discussed Introvigne at length in the article I quoted
- 09:1909:19, 30 October 2019 diff hist +229 Talk:Massimo Introvigne →Gallagher quote in the lead
- 09:1609:16, 30 October 2019 diff hist +876 Talk:CESNUR New Acropolis incident of 1997
- 09:0709:07, 30 October 2019 diff hist +717 Talk:CESNUR →RFC:Is Aum Investigation WP:OR/SYNTH?
- 09:0309:03, 30 October 2019 diff hist −1 m CESNUR →Criticism
- 09:0209:02, 30 October 2019 diff hist +1 m CESNUR →Criticism
- 09:0209:02, 30 October 2019 diff hist +46 CESNUR →Criticism: Typo corrected and full quote of critical article in "Trouw" added
- 08:5908:59, 30 October 2019 diff hist +2,300 CESNUR 1. I tried to solve the controversy about whether the AUM case is germane to CESNUR by moving the corresponding sentences to the section about Melton. 2. Added info on Melton and Barker. 3. Consolidated under "Criticism" critical remarks distributed elsewhere. 4. Put the 1997 incident in context (and it is not irrelevant that the participation of the New Acropolis representative was cancelled, as one of the critical articles remarks). 5. Added that Di Marzio now works with CESNUR
- 08:1108:11, 30 October 2019 diff hist 0 CESNUR Typo
- 08:1008:10, 30 October 2019 diff hist +344 CESNUR Including independent reference from Korean daily. Before discussing controversies, it is logical to explain what CESNUR is all about
29 October 2019
- 23:4523:45, 29 October 2019 diff hist +1 Massimo Introvigne Typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:4423:44, 29 October 2019 diff hist +355 Massimo Introvigne Included independent evaluation by distinguished Swedish scholar Per Faxneld. This is the entry on Introvigne, not on CESNUR, and what he is known for should be explained first Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:2423:24, 29 October 2019 diff hist +435 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:2423:24, 29 October 2019 diff hist +435 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:1623:16, 29 October 2019 diff hist +220 CESNUR Restored Gallagher’s full quote. If you omit this part it seems his opinion is critical while the article by Gallagher is balanced but mostly sympathetic Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:0823:08, 29 October 2019 diff hist +33 CESNUR →Criticism: I am sorry but if you insist that Lewis is “CESNUR-affiliated” you should quote a reliable source for this. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 23:0423:04, 29 October 2019 diff hist −388 CESNUR CESNUR has not defended the Order of the Solar Temple (the only articles I found in the Web site are critical) nor New Acropolis. The sources quoted are a Communist French daily and a fringe political Dutch newspaper and they do not mention any evidence Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 08:3308:33, 29 October 2019 diff hist +999 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) No edit summary
28 October 2019
- 19:4819:48, 28 October 2019 diff hist +312 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) No edit summary
- 17:3017:30, 28 October 2019 diff hist +648 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) No edit summary
- 16:4116:41, 28 October 2019 diff hist 0 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) No edit summary
- 16:3816:38, 28 October 2019 diff hist +486 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) No edit summary
- 16:3216:32, 28 October 2019 diff hist +1,358 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) →Edits: answer
- 15:3815:38, 28 October 2019 diff hist +660 Talk:Oleg Maltsev (psychologist) →Edits
- 13:2613:26, 28 October 2019 diff hist +979 Massimo Introvigne Including more independent sources: two references to The New York Times
- 13:1113:11, 28 October 2019 diff hist +301 Massimo Introvigne →Life and work: Assessment of the relevance of studies on esoteric influences on modern art by Roberta Bosco, in leading Spanish newspaper El País, surely an independent source
- 12:5712:57, 28 October 2019 diff hist +933 CESNUR If Kent's negative approach is immediately presented at the beginning of the article, IMHO the different approach by Gallagher, an equally authoritative scholar (and one as far as I know not associated with CESNUR) should be mentioned as well
- 12:5412:54, 28 October 2019 diff hist 0 m Massimo Introvigne Typo
- 12:5312:53, 28 October 2019 diff hist +940 Massimo Introvigne I understand the animus of the previous edits, but if the negative opinion of CESNUR by Kent is mentioned the positive one of Gallagher (an equally respected and prominent scholar) should be mentioned too. I did not find Gallagher ever mentioned in CESNUR's Web site or elsewhere as associated with CESNUR
- 08:2408:24, 28 October 2019 diff hist +281 User talk:May His Shadow Fall Upon You →CESNUR: new section
- 08:2208:22, 28 October 2019 diff hist +457 Talk:CESNUR →RFC:Is Aum Investigation WP:OR/SYNTH?
- 08:1708:17, 28 October 2019 diff hist +422 User talk:Aidayoung →Removal of content on CESNUR with a misleading edit summary
- 08:1108:11, 28 October 2019 diff hist −231 CESNUR CESNUR has not defended the Order of the Solar Temple but rather criticized it. The source you quote does not mention CESNUR at all. CESNUR has not defended Aum Shinri-Kyo although J. Gordon Melton did - but not on behalf of CESNUR or in CESNUR publications.
- 08:0508:05, 28 October 2019 diff hist +45 CESNUR →Criticism: James Lewis was never a member of CESNUR, although he can be described as a participant in some CESNUR conferences
- 07:3607:36, 28 October 2019 diff hist +489 CESNUR Thanks to the previous editors. I have replaced the quote from CESNUR’s own Website with an independent article in one of Italy’s main daily newspapers
- 07:3007:30, 28 October 2019 diff hist +261 Talk:CESNUR →RFC:Is Aum Investigation WP:OR/SYNTH?
- 07:2707:27, 28 October 2019 diff hist +445 CESNUR Restored some balance. The article was edited to include almost only hostile references