User contributions for Rei
Appearance
A user with 3,264 edits. Account created on 11 August 2003.
21 November 2023
- 08:3108:31, 21 November 2023 diff hist +110 Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 08:2808:28, 21 November 2023 diff hist +268 Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 08:2608:26, 21 November 2023 diff hist +1,946 Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 01:2601:26, 21 November 2023 diff hist +191 Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 01:2501:25, 21 November 2023 diff hist −188 Talk:Sam Altman Didn't realize I wasn't logged in. Fixed the sigs.
20 November 2023
- 10:3010:30, 20 November 2023 diff hist +222 Talk:Sam Altman →Reads like an advertisement tag
- 10:2910:29, 20 November 2023 diff hist +1,803 Sam Altman 1) Stop reverting articles without taking part in talk. 2) Actually cite reasons for reversion, ones again actually supported in talk. 3) I'm adding in yet another secondary source. I don't know what else you could want if not more sourcing since you don't take part in talk. Tag: Reverted
- 10:2410:24, 20 November 2023 diff hist −49 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:Rei (Result: )
- 10:2410:24, 20 November 2023 diff hist +2,068 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User: reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
- 10:2110:21, 20 November 2023 diff hist +483 User talk:Panamitsu No edit summary Tag: Reverted
- 10:0310:03, 20 November 2023 diff hist +1,357 Sam Altman You have now made four reverts in a row with neither improvement to the article nor taking part in the discussion, a gross violation of BRD. Seeking enforcement action. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 10:0010:00, 20 November 2023 diff hist +267 Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 09:5909:59, 20 November 2023 diff hist +168 Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 09:5809:58, 20 November 2023 diff hist +299 Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 09:5209:52, 20 November 2023 diff hist −1 m Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 09:5009:50, 20 November 2023 diff hist +1,357 Sam Altman I am taking part in talk. You are not. If you cannot be bothered to take part in talk, stop reverting the article. Reversions must cite a violated policy. There is now an entire breakdown of the entire BLP policy on the talk page. WP:BLP *requires* inclusion of this content. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 09:4809:48, 20 November 2023 diff hist +186 Talk:Sam Altman →Sister's tweets
- 09:4709:47, 20 November 2023 diff hist +7,195 Talk:Sam Altman No edit summary
- 09:2709:27, 20 November 2023 diff hist +96 Talk:Sam Altman →Annie Altman is NOT a WP:BLP violation
- 09:2709:27, 20 November 2023 diff hist +94 Talk:Sam Altman →Annie Altman is NOT a WP:BLP violation
- 09:2509:25, 20 November 2023 diff hist +191 Talk:Sam Altman No edit summary
- 09:2109:21, 20 November 2023 diff hist +1,357 Sam Altman BOLD says that you should not keep reverting without making improvements. I am making improvements. You are not. Tag: Reverted
- 09:1809:18, 20 November 2023 diff hist +177 Talk:Sam Altman →Annie Altman is NOT a WP:BLP violation
- 09:1209:12, 20 November 2023 diff hist +1,072 Sam Altman You have not "discussed this before" because now there are secondary sources covering it, and in particular, criticizing hiding this information, making the reversion particularly ironic and egregious. There is a talk section. Take part in it before reverting. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 09:1009:10, 20 November 2023 diff hist +372 Talk:Sam Altman No edit summary
- 09:0509:05, 20 November 2023 diff hist +1,072 Sam Altman Very much NOT a BLP violation. Matches tone reqs, credits statements to specific individuals, cites secondary sources, etc. If you want to accuse a BLP violation, you need to cite the part of the BLP policy violated. Talk created. Tag: Reverted
- 08:3608:36, 20 November 2023 diff hist +1,072 Sam Altman How on Earth is this not in the article? Tag: Reverted
25 October 2023
- 12:0912:09, 25 October 2023 diff hist +731 Talk:Tesla, Inc. →Clean energy
- 12:0412:04, 25 October 2023 diff hist +1,227 Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names) No edit summary
- 11:5611:56, 25 October 2023 diff hist −8 Nikolay Pirogov I looked up WP's policy on historic place names. It is: in a historic context, if it's an entirely different name, use the old name. If it's a different spelling, use the old spelling in proper historic titles and quotes (e.g. "Treaty of Nanking") but not with the place (e.g. said article references the city as "Nanjing"). Tag: Reverted
- 11:4711:47, 25 October 2023 diff hist +1 Trichloroethylene Disambiguating "It", as a new noun (chlorothene) had just been introduced in the previous sentence.
18 October 2023
- 10:1410:14, 18 October 2023 diff hist 0 m Induced demand →Criticism
9 October 2023
- 11:2111:21, 9 October 2023 diff hist +21 m Danilo Cavalcante →Capture
5 October 2023
- 12:4512:45, 5 October 2023 diff hist +740 Talk:Deaf-mute No edit summary
- 12:3612:36, 5 October 2023 diff hist −15 Deaf-mute →Historical usage of deaf-mute and other terms: It is not at all remotely common to use the term "mute" to refer to being unintelligent, and some book about 150 years in an obscure Minnesota town is not a valid backing reference.
4 October 2023
- 11:3811:38, 4 October 2023 diff hist −2 m Siege of Seringapatam (1799) →Siege
- 11:3811:38, 4 October 2023 diff hist −2 m Siege of Seringapatam (1799) →Siege
- 11:3811:38, 4 October 2023 diff hist +5 m Siege of Seringapatam (1799) →Siege
30 September 2023
- 16:2916:29, 30 September 2023 diff hist −6 m Induced demand →Criticism: Formatting
29 September 2023
- 12:4512:45, 29 September 2023 diff hist −11 Hyperloop "substantially free of" is bothering me. In Hyperloop Alpha, there still was meaningful air resistance - just not prohibitive air resistance.
- 12:4112:41, 29 September 2023 diff hist +3,179 Induced demand →{{anchor|Transportation}} In transportation systems
15 September 2023
- 11:5911:59, 15 September 2023 diff hist +371 Talk:Hyperloop Remove maintenance template?
- 11:5611:56, 15 September 2023 diff hist +2 m Hyperloop →Historical related concepts
- 11:5611:56, 15 September 2023 diff hist 0 m Hyperloop →Vactrains using the moniker Hyperloop: Capitalization consistency
- 11:5411:54, 15 September 2023 diff hist +197 Hyperloop →Historical: Hyperloop Alpha is not a pneumatic tube, it is not a vactrain, and pneumatic tubes and vactrains are literally opposites, so this constant reference to it as being both is deeply problematic. Brian Dodson is not an authority, and he also dismisses the pneumatic tube relationship in the same article. Dead link too.
- 11:4611:46, 15 September 2023 diff hist 0 m Hyperloop →Political and economic considerations: Consistent
- 11:4511:45, 15 September 2023 diff hist −119 Hyperloop →Political and economic considerations: The very first page lists the ticket price. *facepalm*
- 11:4311:43, 15 September 2023 diff hist 0 Hyperloop →Political and economic considerations
- 11:4311:43, 15 September 2023 diff hist −2 m Hyperloop →Political and economic considerations: Consistent capitalization
- 11:4211:42, 15 September 2023 diff hist −926 Hyperloop →Criticism and human factor considerations: The cited reference does not make a project cost comparison with Hyperloop, and is WP:S. There's a lot of synthesis in this section, which people reading this should know is prohibited on Wikipedia.