Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Lanka Premier League umpires
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:10, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- List of Lanka Premier League umpires (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
CONTENT FORK, COI, SPAM and PROMOTION GenQuest "scribble" 19:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. GenQuest "scribble" 19:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Article already being discussed for merging. No need of this AfD. Human (talk) 22:28, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete If the cricket fans won't allow merger, deletion is the only answer.--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:14, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Article does not need to be merged. It needs to be deleted. None of these subjects are notable outside of their roles as umpires and that roles does not meet the notability requirements anymore than people working concessions or the average attending fan. Does not pass our basic requirements of notability found in WP:N. --ARoseWolf (Talk) 14:38, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as LISTCRUFT. Umpiring in the LPL is routine for the profession; nothing remarkable; no significant coverage of this intersection. Fails NLIST. wjematherplease leave a message... 14:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete is the only solution now per above. desmay (talk) 17:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:LISTCRUFT, as per WP:NOTSTATS. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Nigej (talk) 16:06, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete it should be created after some years, not now. Empire AS Talk! 07:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.