Jump to content

Talk:Essential Video Coding

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 46.187.202.138 (talk) at 18:22, 23 January 2021 (REVC deleteted). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

French wiki writes:

Mpeg5 part 1 = Essential Video Coding = EVC

The codec will be composed of the base profil free of rights and paid (that is with Rights according to some jurisdictions) main profil.

The Main Profile will contain 21 tools that can be independently activated or not and offer increased compression Rate.

MPEG-5 Part 2 = Low Compression Enhanced Video Coding = LC EVC

This standard will improve the compression of any video stream regardless of the basic codec used.



And this info is from me:

Or more precisely is based on about 1h long official lecture - presentation on YouTube (with less the 100 views):

It will have backward compatibility mode.

For example mpeg2 or mpeg4 broadcast with additional Data Frame for Mpeg5 in Transport Stream in order to increase quality, without adding fully paid additional stream with repeated every redundant information just from beginning once more.


It can definitely increase much quality.

But I do not know if it can be used for SD broadcast in mpeg4 in order to increase resolution to HD by Mpeg5 video data frames.

I suppose someone could check that.


I would like to encourage to rename Article, change Title and reorganize

And most of all, to include information from French wiki into English wiki.


Both Parts of MPEG-5

If anyone would be asking Both Parts of MPEG-5 are as much notable:

One - 1st one exactly as notable as the other - 2nd one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.221.231.106 (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2021

As it is now 2021 the first sentence needs to be rewritten. 87.75.117.183 (talk) 01:45, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

REVC deleteted

REVC - The One and The Only One reference to working Open Source Software was deleted.

It is strange to call that not notable enough.

I suppose a lot of software needs to be deleted: Lists_of_software

How can be that:

The One and The Only One objectivly and objectivly working open source software be not notable enough? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.187.202.138 (talk) 18:11, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]