Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naval Intelligence Professionals
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 00:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Naval Intelligence Professionals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
not seeing NORG met here; coverage includes paragraph here and there, and some press releases and passing mentions. Not to be confused with people who are, in fact, Naval Intelligence Professionals. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:02, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.