Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jairaj Varsani

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 03:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jairaj Varsani

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I was not able to find any sources to show a passing of WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Gets plenty of hits but coverage lacks depth. The best I could find was this but even that source only address him very briefly. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:33, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:34, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion is no longer required, I have replaced the sources with more reliable sources from Books / Newspapers — Preceding unsigned comment added by DDP-Trooper1777 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am a bit concerned that Shepherd Management - an agency for actors - is not an independent source. Varsani appears to be a client that they promote. As explained on my talk page, the other sources only provide a name check (i.e. he is only mentioned once, so not significant coverage that addresses him in depth) Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:49, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no real notable coverage, bit part roles not enough to establish notability. Comes close with the BAFTA junior nomination, maybe in a couple of years, but they didn't win it and it's still only bit roles. Canterbury Tail talk 15:59, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR as there's no significant coverage. May be WP:TOOSOON, but it's a no for now.Less Unless (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.