Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brendan Kennedy (businessman)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:02, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brendan Kennedy (businessman)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He does not meet notability requirements and there are no independent RS sources. Deltagammaz (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Deltagammaz (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Deltagammaz (talk) 16:59, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A case of WP:BEFORE. A quick search of "Brendan Kennedy cannabis" shows plenty of in-depth coverage in reliable sources. AfD is not clean-up, and nominators should at least do a modicum of research. Just because all the sources are not in the article, this is not a valid basis for nomination. Edwardx (talk) 11:17, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 02:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:17, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is a Times feature already in the article, add to that the article in Fortune. Googling reveals more coverage of him; not all of it reliable, of course, but I'd say he meets WP:GNG. Modussiccandi (talk) 22:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.