Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Dingman

Kathy Dingman

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG, did nothing of note, and there's no sources for what info there is ItsKesha (talk) 13:06, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable entertainer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:15, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:40, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, The article has lack of references but there are sources like [1], [2], [3]. Also, it needs copyedit to reduce unimportant details about the person. Chirota (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply - that third source is definitely not about her. The Wiki wrestling project deems The Sportster to be unreliable. ItsKesha (talk) 14:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:51, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. If the only sources even mentioning her are unreliable, she is clearly not the subject of GNG-meeting SIGCOV. JoelleJay (talk) 22:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I’ve added her IMDB page showing her RAW appearances, still wish there were more reliable articles. Copper1993 (talk) 02:37, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:IMDB it is considered a generally unreliable source and while it can be acceptable as an external link it can’t be used to establish notability due to the source not being generally reliable. The notability standards call for reliable sources. --67.70.101.238 (talk) 03:02, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]