Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josiah Rojas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 66.31.209.239 (talk) at 17:30, 20 January 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

wow

Josiah Rojas

Josiah Rojas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)

Autobiographical. No shred of verifiable notability. --Infrangible 03:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Agree not even a pretense of notability. No sources either. --Shirahadasha 04:46, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Probably would qualify for a speedy deletion. --Park70 04:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete even though it is quite a good read. No notability of course. --BozMo talk 11:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as no notability has been explained. Jyothisingh 14:22, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete no sources or references Alf photoman 19:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. This is NOT autobiographical. As a member aboard the USS Santa Fe, I have seen Mr. Rojas' actions and have read his entry in The History of the USS Santa Fe, an official Naval publication. Just because you have not heard of someone does not mean that thousands of people have not. I dare any of you to contact the USS Santa Fe. Which one of you tried to look up the sources for this article like the rules for deletion say you should and on top of that is not a reason for deletion, which also applies to your notion of "notability". --tna531 20:48, 19 January 2007
  • Delete as unsourced bio that does not explain why tis servicemember is in any way notable from any other servicemember, and I strongly suggest A7 speedy deletion.-- danntm T C 04:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Absolutely no sources. Even if sources were provided the information in the article doesn't indicate that this individual is particularly notable. Also, Danntm, it is not the responsibility of those 'voting' for deletion to provide sources, rather the burden of proof is on those who wish to keep the article. If you can provide sources that firmly establish the notability of this individual I'm sure everyone here would gladly support keeping the article. --The Way 06:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Even if this individual is notable on his ship or at his workplace, it does not not make the case for Wiki standards of notablility. A search of Google turns up no sources, other than a single Navy newsletter article. DanielEng 09:49, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete no sources, no references, no notability. And what does it mean when it says he is an "expert at the Chevy Tahoe?"   •The RSJ•   Talk | Sign Here 17:29, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]