Talk:Von Mangoldt function

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Expansion of terms

I have removed this section as it is not verified by citation of independent reliable sources, as was requested some time ago. Deltahedron (talk) 16:20, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Sapphorain (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Von Mangoldt function/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

What about Σ((Λ(n)-1)/n) ? (for n=2..)

Last edited at 19:33, 14 August 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 02:40, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Extremely disappointing article

I am extremely disappointed to see that in the definition of the subject of the article, in the section Definition:

The von Mangoldt function, denoted by $Λ($ n), is defined as

\Lambda (n)={\begin{cases}\log p&{\text{if }}n=p^{k}{\text{ for some prime }}p{\text{ and integer }}k\geq 1,\\0&{\text{otherwise.}}\end{cases}}

there is no mention of the fact that the notation "log" refers to the natural logarithm (logarithm to the base e) and not to any other logarithm.

Is it really possible that someone writing this article is unaware that that the notation "log" can refer to various bases of logarithm?

On the other hand, it is entirely possible that a naïve reader of ths article might wonder which logarithm the notation "log" refers to.

I very much hope that people who do not care about whether their writings are understood by readers will stop writing for Wikipedia and find something else to do with their spare time.2601:200:C000:1A0:B948:3237:8DF:ADC2 (talk) 14:41, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]